alphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoTrain with 19 wagons derails in Russia due to interference by unauthorised personswww.pravda.com.uaexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1153arrow-down11cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1152arrow-down1external-linkTrain with 19 wagons derails in Russia due to interference by unauthorised personswww.pravda.com.uaalphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square12fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squaredeadbeef79000linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·8 months agoA strange turn of phrase in the headline. Consider… “A derailment due to interference by authorised persons”.
minus-squareSHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·8 months agoIt’s a relevant distinction. Interference by unauthorized person’s = outsider threat. Other possibilities could be intentional malicious actions by authorized people (insider threat), or a mistake by authorized people (human error, incompetence, negligence, …)
minus-squaredeadbeef79000linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·8 months agoRight on. It’s just that I’d have expected those synonyms to have been used in the headline. Though thinking about it some more: maybe the vagueness is actually more correct if it’s unknown if the interference was deliberate. I suppose it’s a small mercy that the headline wasn’t “unauthorised interference on Russian railway, you’ll never guess how many cars detailed”.
minus-squareRaxiel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 months agoUnauthorized persons discover this one weird trick. Fat controllers hate them!
A strange turn of phrase in the headline. Consider… “A derailment due to interference by authorised persons”.
It’s a relevant distinction.
Interference by unauthorized person’s = outsider threat.
Other possibilities could be intentional malicious actions by authorized people (insider threat), or a mistake by authorized people (human error, incompetence, negligence, …)
Right on.
It’s just that I’d have expected those synonyms to have been used in the headline.
Though thinking about it some more: maybe the vagueness is actually more correct if it’s unknown if the interference was deliberate.
I suppose it’s a small mercy that the headline wasn’t “unauthorised interference on Russian railway, you’ll never guess how many cars detailed”.
Unauthorized persons discover this one weird trick. Fat controllers hate them!