I’ve seen a lot of people who quite dislike Manjaro, and I’m not really sure why. I’m myself am not a Manjaro user, but I did use it for quite a while and enjoyed my experienced, as it felt almost ready out of the box. I’m not here to judge, just wanted to hear the opinion of the community on the matter. Thanks!

  • zlatiah@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Opinion you said?.. https://manjarno.snorlax.sh/

    Thankfully the Manjaro team didn’t seem to have a major mess-up recently, but they did have some very troubled past. Especially now that Arch has a real installer that bundles entire DEs for you, the premise of using an “Arch Linux but easy to use” OS seems less and less

    To each their own though! Nothing wrong with using Manjaro at all if someone really likes it

  • SchizoRamblings@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It has no meaningful place or benefits and everyone defending it seems to just be saying “erm, well why not!” and ignoring the problems its caused when compared to distros like endeavouros

    • GrumpyRobot@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This. It feels like they occupy this weird space between stable and rolling releases that doesn’t really accomplish much. Add on the issues (technical and ethical) over the years, and Manjaro occupies a strange place. Especially as EndeavourOS and even the arch-install script have evolved, it doesn’t quite hold the “arch on easy-mode” vibe it used to.

  • rizoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Manjaro is what got me into Arch so I’ll always have a soft spot for it. I don’t keep up with internet drama so much but I do remember people saying some stuff about the devs being shady/shitty. But I’m not sure how much truth there is to that.

    • IUsedTo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Manjaro is what got me into Arch

      Is Manjaro even considered an Arch? I though it’s Arch based. Maybe I’m wrong

      • INeedMana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is. It’s so close that you can out of the box use arch package manager to install packages.
        And manjaro package management is technically the same. Just slowed down a little bit.

        You could say that arch is “testing” and manjaro “stable”.
        Although arch is very stable in itself, don’t think of it as of Gentoo Unstable.
        Rather “manjaro will have the newest kernel after a few months, not tomorrow”

    • electroskunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s about as bad as Cinnamon coming with an option to automatically kill it and restart if its memory leaks grow beyond a certain size.

  • David Palmer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s pretty good, basically Arch with training wheels. I find I prefer Fedora though.

  • feyo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like the idea and used Manjaro for a few years, but its run by less competent people than Id like (or at least in comparison to other distros), so I stopped and moved to a different distro.

  • siriusmart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ive started out on linux as a Manjaro user, and I still think it’s a great beginner distro, pamac (add/remove software app) being one of the most useful things which im glad it came preinstalled.

    But there are great frustrations about using the aur as half of the packages wont build, so I dont think it will give new users a good arch experience at all as they are just so annoying, new users should opt for endeavour instead of manjaro.

    Also I dont think i would the manjaro team to not screw up things and cause issues such as shipping a broken kernal or whatever they do after the lastest drama, so I dont think I will ever get back to it when there are better arch based distros

    (currently i run vanilla arch)

  • nivenkos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It seems alright but I’ve seen a lot of issues.

    Back when I contributed to ALMA - we’d constantly get issues created by Manjaro users, as it wouldn’t work due to Manjaro having the kernel package set up differently IIRC.

    I’d just use Arch Linux tbh, it’s only painful the first time.

    • IUsedTo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d just use Arch Linux tbh, it’s only painful the first time.

      Makes sense. There’s nothing wrong with vanilla Arch. But may I ask, why should someone use vanilla Arch instead of Arch based like Endevour? Not judging or anything, I’m just not sure if there are any advantages for using vanilla Arch?

  • obsoulete@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I installed Manjaro sometime during 2018, and I have been using it without any major issues. The only issue I had is when AUR packages fail to update. I find that most of the time the issue will resolve itself eventually anyway. Overall, I feel that Manjaro is a nice and stable distro.

    The only negative I can think of is the community. At the time, I was bluntly told to read the manual whenever I needed help or pointers. But, my negative experience was from a few years ago, so hopefully the community has improved today.

    My daily driver distro today is Mint, which I think is more polished than Manjaro.

  • Chris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    manjaro was my way in to arch. i used the fully configured xfce version, then several versions of the minimal install until i got something i liked, and didn’t break after a couple of weeks.

    if you were to ask me for a recommendation on an arch based distro i’d say endeavour, but manjaro is perfectly fine.

  • Scraft161@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Manjaro is what happens when you have a really nice installer for arch linux and some neat extras; but it’s made by people who looked at a 20 minute youtube tutorial about the subject and think they’re now the best in their subject even though they barely know how to refresh their own domain name.

    if you want an arch-like experience use something like XeroxLinux, arco linux, or EndeavourOS instead, they all have their own place in the arch space and are way better at teaching you how to actually use and maintain your system rather than throw some system at it that will break because it is barely maintained and arch is a rolling release distro.

    Brodie Robertson on youtube did a series of videos on the different fuckups by the manjaro team ranging from not refreshing their domain name, DDOS-ing the AUR with their tooling, and pushing broken patches upstream with a rat’s ass of knowledge of what’s actually going on.

  • aetris@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    i used manjaro for a while but endeavour felt a lot more stable when i switched, im on nobara now though