A leading education researcher warns new high-stakes NCEA literacy and maths tests could do more harm than good.

Some key parts:

A leading education researcher warns new high-stakes NCEA literacy and maths tests could do more harm than good.

From 2026 students would not be allowed an NCEA certificate until they had passed all three tests in reading, writing and maths.

Darr said schools needed other options for assessing literacy and numeracy and meeting the requirements should not be a prerequisite for receiving an NCEA qualification.

Literacy and numeracy could be a separate qualification, or they could be included in the NCEA certificates in the same manner that standards from other subjects were included.

  • absGeekNZEnglish
    4·
    11 months ago

    The make/break exam system wasn’t the best, but it did have the advantage that you could get a better idea about someones skills. An A in math and C in English told you something.

    One other issue with the exam system was that it didn’t reflect the “real world”, where NCEA was “better” in this regard. There isn’t really make/break in the world of work, except when there is.

    I have looked at the research; especially boys are being failed by the education system.

    • HappyPig
      4·
      11 months ago

      The main issue NCEA was trying to solve was that these exams severely hindered certain students. Many students have all these skills and can demonstrate them, just not in a test environment. Standardized tests lead to an emphasis on teaching the test and how to pass instead of the actual skills. As an example my son has ADHD is very bright and an excellent reader, but it will be probably years of work to get him to successfully sit an exam or test. Whereas other forms of assessment could easily pass him right now. He has many skills, how important is it that he’s able to sit quietly and write answers on a sheet within a time period?

      • absGeekNZEnglish
        41·
        11 months ago

        I think tests simulate a lot of work environments; big project - months or years of work, has a specific deadline. Annual shuts on industrial sites, consulting type jobs.

        But it isn’t great for lots of students.

        NCEA style internal assessment simulates a more regular type of work; show up - do good work most days and you’ll be fine. Office job style.

        But it isn’t great for lots of students.

        It is difficult to cater to all, when we use methods that favour specific people.

    • DaveOPMA
      2·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, it’s a hard one to solve without putting significant resources into the education system, which we know isn’t high on anyone’s priority list.