Hey I’ve had this video sitting around waiting for me to watch it, I finally got around to it. It’s a great video, does a great job of summarising the announcement, explaining how the ship works, and discussing potential causes and problem points.
Thanks for posting it!
No problem!
Personally I don’t do a full meal prep day, I just cook 3x more than I need and freeze the extra. By the time you’ve gone to the effort of cooking what you need, cooking a much bigger batch generally isn’t that much extra work. That way I only have to cook a few times a week yet get home cooked meals every day, and also get different things each day (not 7 days of lasagne).
However, most of the students who attempted the tests this year were in Year 10 (51,252)
I thought you didn’t normally do NCEA Level 1 until year 11. Is this a case of running students in a year early, so some pass and are ahead of the game, and the rest can work on it next year?
Yeah hopefully the new owner has a plan and the experience to follow through.
I tend to find the saucier or sloppier a dish is, the better it freezes. I also avoid chicken as I don’t think it comes out very nice after cooking, freezing, and reheating.
Minced meats work well. Lasagne, moussaka, bolognese (cook the spaghetti at time of eating, don’t freeze it).
Also stews, pulled pork, or other slow cooked food. If you use a slow cooker, most of what you cook in there is probably good for freezing.
In general I prefer to cook vegetables, pasta, rice, etc at the time of eating and then eat with the reheated food, because they don’t really taste that nice after being frozen and reheated, but it should be pretty quick to do those and don’t really need much work.
What if you cooked meals that freeze well. Then you could cook some meals, and freeze into portions.
When you get hungry, heat and eat. Separate the cooking and eating stages?
I think this is still not a citable claim. You link to the affirmative conclusion from a negative premise which includes that statement, but that page is explaining what that is. Your other page is using a claim to prove a different topic.
The problem is that Wikipedia is not where you prove things. You need to cite somewhere else that proves it, and you need to do it in an impartial way.
For example, saying that ‘“If you have nothing to hide you shouldn’t fear surveillance from the state” is a logical fallacy’ and citing the book makes Wikipedia have that stance.
But in contrast, you could say that 'Critics argue that the argument “If you have nothing to hide you shouldn’t fear surveillance from the state” is a logical fallacy" then cite the book, this way the critic is the one with the opinion and not Wikipedia.
More citations of more critics would probably help too.
I’m not an expert on Wikipedia by any means, but I do see why someone may have considered this statement not belonging on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia has some info here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view
Also see the links at the top of that page about “Verifiability” and “No Original Research” as these are the three key things needed to allow the statement.
Not that I disagree, but Wikipedia requires specific criteria for sources. I am not sure that a book about it being a logical fallacy meets that criteria any more than a book about parenting could be used to prove how to parent a child.
Are there other Wikipedia pages that claim things to be logical fallacies that could be used to see what the burden of proof is for this claim?
Apparently the wrong crowd! I have no idea sorry, I guess the child has parents that could help?
The title has two questions and this one only fits one of them.
Wish wasn’t cancelled, yes!
Wish they brought it back? No, it was a long time ago, and they made Serenity to close off the story and tie things up. It’s likely that bringing it back would do more harm than good.
Haha it all makes sense now 😋
Now I feel like I need to look up how to make focaccia, is it not just mixing ingredients in a bowl, a bit of kneading, and then baking it? How do you demolish your kitchen making bread!
You are sure that no one has heard of Homestar Runner on a website of technology savvy early adopters whose age averages in the 30s and 40s?
That looks amazing!
I think the implication is he was the greatest idiot until all the other Impressionable idiots outdid him.
Yes, but this is something you are using 5-10 times a day… right? Something else can go.
Any smoke alarm I’ve seen always has the year of production on them, or the year of expiry (typically 10 years after production).
This is not a suggestion to have KDE track users, it’s a proposal to build software you could optionally use to help you assign donations to services you use. I would expect the data to be local, and if you don’t want to be tracked then you wouldn’t install it.
Even just the tracking would be helpful. Track what you use and then a notification each month where you put in how much you want to donate, it tells you how much should go to each thing, and then gives you links to their donate page. I’d love to see my split, even if just to adjust my monthly donations or to see if I’m missing any.
However, a significant number of the services I use are self-hosted websites. Tracking that may be a bit tricky.
Just like the rest of my code.