Hey

I’m a developer that has a few accessibility clients at the moment.

Specifically, Spinal NZ are looking for a knowledge sharing/support platform that will fix some of Facebook Groups’s problems, including:

  • Unable to suitably categorise Posts (sub-group/topic type/region)
  • Difficulty searching/filtering
  • Posts ‘drop off’ the bottom (due to inability to filter)
  • Continual hacking risk
  • Platform controlled by off-shore corporate interests

I have an intuition that federated platforms such as lemmy may align to the needs of accessibly communities, given its openness, self governance etc.

I would host an instance for the community so that they can self-moderate and connect up to other instances that might align with their needs.

I was wondering if anyone would recommend using lemmy for this purpose, if there are other federated systems that might carry out the same goal?

  • @DaveMA
    link
    3
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The idea is solid, the implementation may leave something too be desired. A hesitation I have is that Lemmy is new and unstable. It can be tricky getting things to work right for the average person, I can’t imagine it’s an easy time for anyone with higher accessibility requirements.

    Unable to suitably categorise Posts (sub-group/topic type/region)

    I think the only thing on Lemmy that helps with this is creating different communities on an instance. There is currently no tagging of posts or anything like that.

    Difficulty searching/filtering

    I’m not sure the search on lemmy is all that great? And with no tagging, filtering is pretty non-existent.

    Posts ‘drop off’ the bottom (due to inability to filter)

    Lemmy lets you go through each page so you shouldn’t have a problem with not being able to go back far enough. It also allows you to sort by new comments so it’s easy to find the things people are commenting on.

    Continual hacking risk

    This is a risk for any platform. I guess one benefit is you have your own backups, so if something happens you can restore from a backup. But I’d think Lemmy is much more likely to get hacked than a facebook group (with admins using 2FA). It wasn’t that long ago that a security issue in the Lemmy software caused the largest Lemmy instance to have an admin account taken over by a malicious user.

    Platform controlled by off-shore corporate interests

    This is a benefit of Lemmy. You control it, you host it, you own it. You can choose which other servers you federate with (if any).

    Also, it seems like this might be something that is helpful to get a wider range of opinions on. The community on [email protected] is significantly larger than this !support community, perhaps you could cross post it there as well? (there is a little icon under the post for cross posting if you’re accessing Lemmy from a browser).

    Also r/blind set up a Lemmy server at https://rblind.com and they may have some suggestions on whether it’s suitable.

    One thing that may help that people often don’t know, when you post a picture in Lemmy (or anywhere using markdown), you can put alt text so blind users can have their screen reader tell them what’s in the image. You put the alt text in the [], like so: ![alt text](https://image.url)

    • @edtOP
      link
      English
      211 months ago

      Hey Dave, I really appreciate your in-depth response.

      Good to hear honest feelings about lemmy and some of its problems.

      If I were to use lemmy, I would probably extend the code a bit to support the categorisation that we needed. Have you had any interaction with the backend? I’m happy with programming Rust and JS so think it might be possible to add the features we need.

      • @DaveMA
        link
        111 months ago

        I haven’t, and I haven’t tried, but there are lots of new contributors over the last few months that seem to be picking it up fine. I’m not familiar with Rust so haven’t looked at all.

  • @SamC
    link
    2
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    deleted by creator