Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) said policy differences toward Israel between her and President Biden won’t stop her from supporting him in the November general election.

“Of course,” Omar said Tuesday, when asked by CNN’s Abby Phillip on “NewsNight” whether she would vote for Biden if the election were held that day, in a clip highlighted by Mediaite. “Democracy is on the line, we are facing down fascism.”

“And I personally know what my life felt like having Trump as the president of this country, and I know what it felt like for my constituents, and for people around this country and around the world,” Omar continued. “We have to do everything that we can to make sure that does not happen to our country again.”

  • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    In context of Biden, it’s to have him on the white house to get some benefits possible, and he is the most realistic option because of Duverger’s Law. Which goes back to my point of there is no good answer as to when was the last time third party has made a huge dent electorally.

    • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      if you’re a leftist, and you are voting for biden, don’t pretend it’s because he’s a leftist or will help leftists. he’s not and he won’t.

      • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Let’s see. Student debt cleared to some degree. Pay raise for low wage workers. Yes, there were some.

        Also, love that you ignored the issue of Duverger’s Law.

        • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          >you ignored the issue of Duverger’s Law.

          just as i would have if you’d raised the book of revelation. lots of people believe it predicts the future, but it doesn’t.

              • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                By what evidence do you have for that? We can look at vote records and note that Duverger’s Law matches electoral records, and it is based on real world observation of elections. The other one has zero predictive power because it’s not based on anything other than guess work.

                • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  >We can look at vote records and note that Duverger’s Law matches electoral records, and it is based on real world observation of elections

                  so? so tell me what the split is going to be in november using duverger’s law. make a prediction using it.

                  • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    At this point in time, 2.5%(+/-).5% . Easy to figure out when it’s only 2 parties since 1968 and looking up election results.