• ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶
      link
      68
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      This is actually fucking scary.

      They also took issue with him being brought back to life as he’d signed a ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ order years earlier, The Des Moines Register reported at the time.

      This sets the precedent that the convict is no longer in possession of their own body and life.

      “Death is no escape. You will suffer as long as we want you to.”

      Welcome to the birth of Hell.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I could be wrong, but I’m pretty sure that is something signed by choice, saying that the prisoner doesn’t want to be resuscitated if they die. I don’t think that is forced on them, but again, I could be wrong.

        edit: nvm, I get what you’re saying now

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        26 months ago

        Well

        Benjamin Schreiber was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison in 1996, after clubbing a man to death with the handle of a pickaxe and leaving his body outside a trailer. Schreiber had conspired with the man’s girlfriend to murder him.

        I’d be more scared with him free

      • AlexanderESmith
        link
        fedilink
        -66 months ago

        @luthis

        I mean…;

        Benjamin Schreiber was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison in 1996, after clubbing a man to death with the handle of a pickaxe and leaving his body outside a trailer. Schreiber had conspired with the man’s girlfriend to murder him.

        He took away someone else’s body and life first.

  • NaN
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    People have tried the argument when they were resuscitated. The courts have thrown it out, as the sentence is meant to be their entire lifetime regardless of medical interventions that may artificially extend it. If someone is capable of making the argument, they have not fulfilled their sentence. Also, I think generally if you can be brought back you were not actually dead, you were near death and would have died if not for intervention (one might say only mostly dead and not dead dead).

    It would take very poorly written laws that somehow define life to only include a single period of an uninterrupted heartbeat to allow it to work.

    If and when somebody is resurrected after three days, the courts might be forced to reconsider.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      26 months ago

      only mostly dead and not dead dead

      Nice reference, bro. That was the second movie I ever bought, on VHS.

    • CarrotsHaveEars
      link
      fedilink
      16 months ago

      Well said. If we ever have the medical advancement of bringing back three-day corpses, we can brainwash the criminals to be good people instead.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    286 months ago

    I think there are few historical examples where someone was hanged and pronounced dead but then woke up and were pardoned.

  • ara
    link
    fedilink
    216 months ago

    “life sentence in prison” means he is sentenced for life, so if he gets alive again he would be still with that sentence that is for life. It’s not a “sentence until death”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      26 months ago

      I mean… You can be clinically dead and then revived with cpr and a defibrillator, so not entirely unrealistic.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    136 months ago

    If he dies for long enough to complete all the paper work and produce death certeficate then he would be free

    • Otter
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 months ago

      Unfortunately the person would not have any papers after, and trying to get papers may send them back to prison

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    136 months ago

    I think so. I read about a guy who stayed dead for couple of years for tax reasons.

    (If you get the reference you’ll get a high five)

  • Colonel Sanders
    link
    fedilink
    English
    56 months ago

    Not sure how it is in other countries, but I always assumed that a “life” sentence at least in the US just meant anything over 25 years

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      In civilised counties it means indefinite, 20 years minimum and after that reviewed every couple of years. In some countries 25 years is the maximum mandatory sentence you can get, the next level is life.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    At least in Canada a “life” sentence is just a really long amount of time. I think 21 years?

    EDIT: Looked into it. It’s indefinite, only getting a chance to appeal after 25 years.