• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Isn’t this a misleading/clickbaity title? 🤔

    The title of the article is “Twitch quickly reverses policy that “went too far” allowing nudity — Twitch confirmed its policy banning nudity was sexist.”

    • Onihikage
      link
      fedilink
      English
      106 months ago

      The title does need updated, but I suspect it was accurate at the time of posting 23 hours ago. The article appears to have been updated at least twice, based on the URL.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        116 months ago

        That’s my biggest gripe with online news articles. Editing titles and content.

        I witnessed it happen in real time a couple months back when they were switching between Hamas and IDF bombing that hospital, modern media is a shambles

        • Baby Shoggoth [she/her]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          56 months ago

          It’s not really editing titles. They publish it with various titles that get split-tested at first, whichever version of the title gets more clicks then becomes the only title used.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          16 months ago

          Maybe it should be a requirement to preserve original headlines at the bottom of the article if they change it.

          OK, not requirement, who would ever enforce that, but it would be a nice trend, if nothing else.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    106 months ago

    🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

    Click here to see the summary

    In one prominent example, just two days before the policy change, Twitch banned OnlyFans model Morgpie for posting “topless” streams.

    Hession confirmed that Twitch’s policy prohibiting “content that ‘deliberately highlighted breasts, buttocks or pelvic region,’ even when fully clothed” was confusing.

    “Streamers found it difficult to determine what was prohibited and what was allowed and often evaluating whether or not a stream violated this portion of the policy was subjective,” Hession wrote.

    The only exceptions will be made for streams labeled as including mature-rated games and profanity, which will still appear in the main feed on the homepage.

    “In addition to providing clarity, these updates will also reduce the risk of inconsistent enforcement and bring our policy more in line with other social media services.”

    “With the updated terms of service, content on Twitch containing mature themes will be allowed but no longer pushed on the homepage of the site,” Morgpie told Dexerto.


    Saved 78% of original text.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    36 months ago

    I don’t see many men disrobing in just chatting, i gee, i wonder why women were disproportionately banned

    • Zellith
      link
      fedilink
      16 months ago

      I’ll show you my bits if you give me your bits.

  • RandoCalrandian
    link
    fedilink
    16 months ago

    So, if it was the male streamers that had been flashing children, then the old rules would have been just fine?

    This is not a good move

    • conciselyverbose
      link
      fedilink
      16 months ago

      If it’s labeled as adult it’s not the streamer’s responsibility to keep children from watching.

      And content targeting adults has a very clear right to exist whether Twitch decides they want to host it or not.

      • RandoCalrandian
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        Sure, but that attitude doesn’t do much for you when children is twitches main demographic.

        • conciselyverbose
          link
          fedilink
          16 months ago

          It literally doesn’t matter.

          There would be nothing wrong with dudes clearly labeling swinging their dicks around as adult content. It isn’t their responsibility to control how twitch handles adult content.

          • RandoCalrandian
            link
            fedilink
            16 months ago

            That comparison would only make sense if that was happening, which it isn’t.

            Twitch has been essentially a soft core version of these girls’ only fans for a while now, and their adult content has been put in front of children, unconsentually.

            Ffs, these changes are to help stop the blatantly sexual thumbnails from being shown on the front page

            And yea, twitch knows they bring in money and so won’t do anything to stop them, but this will make the whole “protect the children” thing 10x worse, as twitch actively targets younger viewers and so do these adult “performers”

            • conciselyverbose
              link
              fedilink
              16 months ago

              This rule was an attempt to make it more clearly labeled, so yes, it’s exactly what it’s about.

              It absolutely has every right to exist.

              • RandoCalrandian
                link
                fedilink
                16 months ago

                Where the fuck is this “right to exist” shit coming from

                You’re attacking an argument I never made

                • conciselyverbose
                  link
                  fedilink
                  16 months ago

                  You’re attacking their effort to formally label it without punishing it.

                  Thinking it doesn’t deserve to exist is the only possible cause for that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    16 months ago

    “Now, labeled content is allowed that features “body writing on female-presenting breasts and/or buttocks regardless of gender” and “erotic dances that involve disrobing or disrobing gestures, such as strip teases.”