• RandoCalrandian
    link
    fedilink
    17 months ago

    So, if it was the male streamers that had been flashing children, then the old rules would have been just fine?

    This is not a good move

    • conciselyverbose
      link
      fedilink
      16 months ago

      If it’s labeled as adult it’s not the streamer’s responsibility to keep children from watching.

      And content targeting adults has a very clear right to exist whether Twitch decides they want to host it or not.

      • RandoCalrandian
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        Sure, but that attitude doesn’t do much for you when children is twitches main demographic.

        • conciselyverbose
          link
          fedilink
          16 months ago

          It literally doesn’t matter.

          There would be nothing wrong with dudes clearly labeling swinging their dicks around as adult content. It isn’t their responsibility to control how twitch handles adult content.

          • RandoCalrandian
            link
            fedilink
            16 months ago

            That comparison would only make sense if that was happening, which it isn’t.

            Twitch has been essentially a soft core version of these girls’ only fans for a while now, and their adult content has been put in front of children, unconsentually.

            Ffs, these changes are to help stop the blatantly sexual thumbnails from being shown on the front page

            And yea, twitch knows they bring in money and so won’t do anything to stop them, but this will make the whole “protect the children” thing 10x worse, as twitch actively targets younger viewers and so do these adult “performers”

            • conciselyverbose
              link
              fedilink
              16 months ago

              This rule was an attempt to make it more clearly labeled, so yes, it’s exactly what it’s about.

              It absolutely has every right to exist.

              • RandoCalrandian
                link
                fedilink
                16 months ago

                Where the fuck is this “right to exist” shit coming from

                You’re attacking an argument I never made

                • conciselyverbose
                  link
                  fedilink
                  16 months ago

                  You’re attacking their effort to formally label it without punishing it.

                  Thinking it doesn’t deserve to exist is the only possible cause for that.

                  • RandoCalrandian
                    link
                    fedilink
                    16 months ago

                    Or, just maaaaybe, it deserves to be in its own space, away from children, and these labels are only going to help with the appearance of that, and not the actual issue

                    You’re strawmanning drying to defend this, and I don’t understand why you’re triggered so hard