• OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Judges on the Canadian Supreme Court are similarly appointed by the executive (they just have a Prime Minister instead of a President) so that isn’t the problem.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You’re missing the point, Canadian judges don’t have to tell which party they support so there’s no expectation from them and it’s much harder to make a call before the case begins what the judges’ opinion will be even if they’ve been put in place by a specific party.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        American Supreme Court justices don’t have to tell which party they support either.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Not really, it happens pretty often that the supreme court rules against what would be the wish of the government and it’s pretty sad that a Canadian would believe otherwise.

          • aidan@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            supreme court rules against what would be the wish of the government

            Can you site an example of that? I mean where the supreme court rules that the legislature can’t do something that it tried to do. Not just the executive excercising power it doesn’t have. From my understanding, in the Canadian system the legislature effectively has absolute power as it is the directly elected body and meant to represent the will of the people.