• nikscha@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nuclear waste sucks!

    BUT: We already have about 60 years worth of it, and we need to find a long term storage solution regardless.

    And assuming we would double the amount of nuclear waste, then it would only take one additional half-time to decay.

    Go nuclear!

    • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Spent fuel rod reactors are well into development, and they will be able to use that waste to generate power and leave behind non-radioactive materials.

      • nikscha@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes that’s true but that’s also not the point. The point is that we already have a problem and making it twice the size doesn’t make it twice as bad

        • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It will take quite a while to double our spent fuel rods, and once we start using them for fuel we can tackle the rods faster than we produce them.

          In the meantime underground storage works just fine without harming people or the environment much.