Summary

Kamala Harris’s political skills have transformed a potentially disastrous 2024 presidential election into a competitive race.

Despite initial skepticism and a challenging campaign, Harris has improved her public image and closed the gap with Trump on key issues. Since Biden stepped aside in July and endorsed her, she has shifted from an unpopular vice president to a viable candidate, even matching Trump in polls on economic issues.

Her leadership has given Democrats a chance to prevent a Trump landslide and halt the rise of American authoritarianism.

  • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Why is no one discussing Dems have lost the senate and given a bigger majority in the house to Republicans. Even without Trump they are bound to control house and the senate.

    Stand by for nothing happening for the next 2 years or worse.

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Did she win? No? Then it doesn’t fucking matter!

    What? Should she be getting a participation trophy? Sorry, I can’t hear you over how Ukraine is being annexed by Russia.

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      36 minutes ago

      Also it wasn’t a toss up. Trump won every single swing state. All of them. This article is some mad copium. Prepare to see more of it over the next few days.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      54 minutes ago

      Panelist on pbs live election coverage was saying Harris ran a flawless campaign. They just dont get it.

  • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Close, but no cigar does not preserve actual democracy, unfortunately.

    Calling yourself a democracy, and being a democracy are two very different things. The first proper word in North Korea’s official country name is “Democratic”, and bear in mind Russia holds “elections” as well.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The fact that you thought I would vote for a WOMAN over a Rapist Felon who Promised to create HUGE Financial Hardships while killing my Daughter is LAUGHABLE!

  • Resonosity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Edit: If Kamala loses, and it looks like she might, I’m blaming her and her campaign. She could have swooned the beliefs of America if she had ran on something better.

    Her political skills are trash.

    Kamala gained the most approved points after Biden gave her the race.

    Since then, her approval rating has plummeted compared to her early numbers, and I think this is because Kamala doesn’t really know what to believe.

    You can see it with Tim Walz. There was a lot of momentum when Kamala took up the mantle, and that momentum was carried through once the Walz pick came out. Then, around the DNC, the campaign’s tone shifted, crawling back to the ethos of the Biden administration. I think this is because Kamala couldn’t decide to break away from Biden or not, and because she waited so long, she was around a lot of the same people in the Biden administration, and those people influenced her platform. You can also see this with marijuana and how she changed sides in her time between being DA and senator. Also, how she didn’t really have a solid platform to begin with, which should have been established right when Walz was picked.

    I’m not here to call her out as a flip flopper. I’m pointing to how she could have steamrolled this election, but chose not to. It saddened me so much when the campaign had silence Tim for his views and policies when those views and policies were the key to victory.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      It’s truly embarrassing as hell to have a Democratic party that can’t absolutely crush a clown like Trump. The Democratic establishment isn’t just out of touch, it’s weak as fuck. Yes, this is on Kamala, but it’s also on Obama, and the Clintons, and Pelosi, and Schumer, and the whole “anyone but Bernie” coalition. This is the consequence of running to the center instead of tackling wealth inequality head on.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s honestly unreal that Trump is even in the race, let alone in a position to pull off a possible win. After everything that has happened. I try to keep a positive spirit in general, but it’s not easy to be optimistic on behalf of the US right now.

    • Montagge@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s not unreal at all. I don’t understand why time after time people underestimate what monsters the average American is.

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Well, now that it looks like Trump is actually going to pull it off, we’re all in for a world of fun over the next four years. We might actually discover just how monstrous things will get.

        • fourish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Four years? You’re awfully optimistic that he’ll ever leave if given power again.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Its a historic win for accelerationists I guess. Viva la revolution.

          Sometimes I wonder if the centrists are crypto-accelerationists, because they always run to the center for nonexistent votes like clockwork, and predictably always lose.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Harris will be the lightning rod for democract anger, but the DNC are ultimately the ones to blame for allowing the first convicted president.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’d argue the opposite.

    The fact that Americans are possibly still voting for someone who will bring in the Fourth Reich if elected, over the first female president is a sign of just how badly Democrats have dropped the ball. ESPECIALLY after Jan 6th.

    • Zess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s not the Democrats’ fault that there are so many cowardly, weak-minded, brainwashed losers in this country who fall for every bit of propaganda the GOP puts out. Politics shouldn’t be about culture wars but that’s how the republicans get votes.

      • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It is the Democrats fault that there are so many cowardly, weak-minded losers in charge of the party though.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The Democrats are responsible for 50+ years of neglecting working Americans that created the culture you’re complaining about.

      • hraegsvelmir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        You could certainly say the Democrats should have been able to come up with a better outreach plan rather than running the same old plan that hasn’t penetrated into this group for the last several elections. It’s not as though the culture war nonsense and insane rightwing elements of the party are novel factors, such that the Dems can shrug their collective shoulders and say “Hey, we did our best, be we were flying blind into the unknown.”

    • tacosplease@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I 100% agree except why is it that “Democrats dropped the ball”?

      Democrats aren’t voting for a fascist. Their politicians are not enabling a fascist. The Democratic voting base hasn’t been bamboozled by 30+ years of obvious propaganda pretending to be news.

      Christians dropped the ball. Conservative immigrants dropped the ball. Legit news media dropped the ball. Large corporations and wealthy individuals dropped the ball… on purpose.

      Democrats work on harm reduction because we don’t give them enough votes to make meaningful changes. A 1 or 2 vote margin isn’t enough to vote around the moles like Manchin and Sinema.

      • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Christians dropped the ball. Conservative immigrants dropped the ball. Legit news media dropped the ball. Large corporations and wealthy individuals dropped the ball… on purpose.

        There is a literal industry built on lies

        • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          To be fair, just being a corrupt industry full of scumbags is actually progress when it comes to religion. Go back 100 years let alone 500 and it was more like its own authoritarian political party. now it’s just hobby lobby with more private jets, and…well, that’s a good thing. I don’t ever want to have to expect the Spanish inquisition.

        • hraegsvelmir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It’s really tiring seeing you guys trot out the “it’s all leftist’s fault for not voting for us!” line again and again when the actions of your candidate give it away for the lie that it is. Leftists cannot simultaneously be the cause of every Democratic defeat, yet too insignificant a group to merit any consideration in party platform.

          Go back to your handlers for better propaganda, this one doesn’t work on anyone with a pulse.

      • Clbull@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Bernie Sanders

        Pete Buttigieg

        Or if they could have approached a very popular celebrity such as Dwayne Johnson or Taylor Swift and asked them to run.

        Even Andrew Yang could have produced a better result if he made a better campaign pitch than focusing his solely on leftist pipe dreams that will bankrupt the country such as UBI.

    • nfh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I think both can be true. That she cleaned up the situation is a testament to her skill as a candidate, and the fact this situation happened is in no small part an indictment of the Democratic party, in which she’s among its most senior leaders

      • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        no she didn’t. she had a window of positive energy she just tanked. jesus did we watch the same candidate running? lol

        • blakemiller@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          What evidence are you using to support your belief that she tanked? That’s a surprise to me and I’d like to understand more.

      • Aoife@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Look blaming the democrats is done not because the republicans aren’t to blame, but because blaming them is sort of pointless. It’s like blaming terrorists for the shit they do. Yes, it’s their fault. Yes, they’re morally reprehensible. So what? Are you going to spend time trying to come up with detailed arguments for what they could’ve done better? No, you look to the material conditions, people, and organizations responsible for fighting them, and for making sure people aren’t desperate enough to join them, because their job at least in theory is to do better. I blame the democrats because I believe they could have done better. I do not have even that small grain of hope when it comes to the republicans.

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    What’s more amazing is that no one is saying “is America ready for a woman president?” this time around, like they were in 2016. It’s refreshing, but also sad that it took this long.

    Never fucking mind. At this point I decide whether suicide or applying for a green card is the easier option.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    288
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    It’s not a testament to her abilities, it’s a depressing statement about the state of America that a convicted felon, rapist, fascist loudman can be neck and neck with probably one of the smartest, most highly accomplished presidential candidates we’ve had in quite a while

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I blame stupid voters AND Republicans trying to pull of a coup through voter suppression.

      Up next, endless court cases in an attempt to get SCOTUS to hand over the election to Trump.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yep, the truth is it shouldn’t even be this close, but Kamala has moved significantly right in the last four years.

      The Dem party doesn’t try to get landslide victories, they want to give voters the absolute minimum they need to win. It’s the only explanation for why they keep moving right after Obama’s 08 landslide

      • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yep, the truth is it shouldn’t even be this close, but Kamala has moved significantly right in the last four years.

        Actually, that’s probably why she’s winning. Because of the nature and makeup of the Electoral College, we can consider the Presidential election biased in favor of the GOP candidate.

        It’s the only explanation for why they keep moving right after Obama’s 08 landslide

        I’ve explained this in detail before, so rather than reposting, I’ll just point folks over to this, https://lemmy.world/comment/12409521

        The Dem party doesn’t try to get landslide victories, they want to give voters the absolute minimum they need to win.

        Well, I’m sure they would if they could. But see above - it’s not possible with the current structure. I’m still hopeful that we can get Harris elected, and then have a chance of getting the 127 DC states plan to pass - https://www.vox.com/2020/1/14/21063591/modest-proposal-to-save-american-democracy-pack-the-union-harvard-law-review

        Which would allow Dems to pass the required constitutional amendments to address the systemic problems with the current, erm, system.

      • Montagge@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        In the country that very possibly going to vote Trump back in a party moving to the left would be a death sentence.

      • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        15 hours ago

        […] cost the Wall-Street class anything significant…

        And herein is your problem. The Wall-Street class is the most influential voting bloc in America. If you don’t bow to them, you don’t even make it onto the ballot, let alone into the oval office. The only way it is possible to get around this, in modern America, would be if you acted like you were going to play ball with Wall Street up until you’re sworn into office, and then pull the most epic bait and switch of all time on them.

        To be clear, I don’t expect this from Harris. But if she were going to do it, exactly what she’s doing now would be the way you accomplish that. Let the megadonors believe that you’re on their side until you reach a point where they can’t stop you.

        • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I am all but praying that Harris is pulling a bait and switch on Wall Street. It’s the only way I see fascism being actually stopped, instead of merely delayed or slowed by 4-8 years.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        TBH when her candidacy first was announced I was completely convinced that Trump had already won… A woman, AND black?

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Voting is a two way street.

      You can’t put all the blame on voters and none on the campaign. One of those groups gets paid millions and millions of dollars to get a D president.

      When we ran a young charismatic candidate with a progressive campaign in 08, it was easy to get voters on board and red states became blue, it even carried over to flipping state governments

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        If we had a moderately sane Republican running, I’d agree with you.

        But anyone who looks at Trump and thinks “Yep, that guy should have the nuclear football” is a fucking moron and I’m terrified that they’re allowed to operate motor vehicles.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          But you can still make the argument the DNC seeing trump and using that as an excuse to run candidates more conservative than Dem voters are is also a dangerous thing…

          That’s what I’m saying, you can blame 10s of millions of voters, or the handful of people at the DNC who get paid millions to get a Dem elected.

          Both should do the right thing, and I get criticizing both. I even get criticizing the handful of wealthy unelected people running the DNC as the priority.

          But I’ll never understand why so many people demand only voters compromise and insist the handful of unelected wealthy, powerful, and connected people running the DNC are above reproach

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            If the Republicans were running a sane choice, then Democrats holding to their ideals would be key. Voters would have an actual choice and candidates would need to better distinguish themselves

            However we have a scenario where the Republicans candidate is not a sane choice for the future of our democracy, our country, our future, and are in some sort of bizarro world where half the population is fine with that. A bizarro world where saying the quiet part out loud is “telling it like it is”, where blatant corruption and fascism is somehow not just tolerated but even celebrated. Where it’s ok to be racist, sexist, and scapegoating is the strategy of the day

            While I’m happy to be voting FOR Harris, it’s critical in so many ways to vote AGAINST Trump, his excesses, his corruption, his abuse of power, his signature for sale, his lackey for Putin, his willingness to sacrifice our future for more money today, his narcissism at the expense of the citizens a President is meant to serve

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I don’t blame Democratic voters. I blame every voter. This should be a no brainer. Trump should be polling in the single digits.

            Americans are fucking stupid. The ones who vote are stupid. The ones who run the parties are stupid. The ones who don’t vote are stupid.

            I keep trying to hitch a ride off this bug infested mudball but even the aliens know to avoid it.

          • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Bill Clinton, who won in 1992, was from the midwestern state of Arkansas. I think this trend started long before, and has to do with the center of the US shifting differently from some of the more populated areas of the US.

      • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        When we ran a young charismatic candidate with a progressive campaign in 08, it was easy to get voters on board and red states became blue, it even carried over to flipping state governments

        See https://lemmy.world/comment/12409521 - but the TLDR is that 2008 isn’t comparable, since a major gerrymandering effort by the GOP took place in 2010 that took Dems by surprise - and this gerrymandering made the above virtually impossible to repeat (by design, I might add).

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Or is a testament to how effective rich authoritarians have been at keeping much of the public uneducated and or fed misinformation.