A lot less annoying then endlessly filtering content by community and user

  • Vinny_93@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The downside of that is the filter bubble or echo chamber effect. Question is whether Lemmy should be a fun experience for you or something to broaden your horizons a little

    • weariedfae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Bruh. It’s not an echo chamber to filter out literal Nazis and other stuff. Ain’t nobody changing their mind from “spirited” internet debate and I don’t need their garbage in my day.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        46 minutes ago

        If you really mean “literal Nazis”, that tends to support the hypothesis that you’re not being exposed to much that contradicts your worldview.

    • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 minutes ago

      As is the default Lemmy experience isn’t a massive filter bubble in itself. I doubt hardly anyone here would want to federate with Twitter and Truth Social even though that would make your feel, in fact, less of an echo chamber. Hell, a huge number of inctances don’t even federate with Hexbear, Lemmygrad or Threads.

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You can listen to people try to convince you that Russia’s war is justified and that Tienamen Square never happened for a while if you want, then make up your mind and block them later ;-).

      • weariedfae@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I agree, the filters here are great. I don’t mind the real world stuff but I filter your instance because I don’t want to see furry porn.

        (Not trying to be snarky, your kinks are not any of my business, hence the filter. My comment is meant to be genuine.)

      • digger@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Exactly. I want to be able to mention the fashion lizard, the bisexual twink doctor, and his husband the suffering Irishman… And for people to understand who I’m talking about.

    • Fleur_@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I feel like the term echo chamber gets thrown around a lot. Imo an echo chamber has to be highly specific. I wouldn’t classify every monolingual person as trapped in an echo chamber for example. I would also argue against to idea of having to be weary of creating your own echo chamber online. Use social media how you like, the solution to echo chambers is going outside and touching grass not forcing yourself to interact with every community on the internet.

      • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s an echo chamber whether you think that’s a bad thing or not, only being exposed to one type of view point is what an echo chamber is. And people probably should be exposed to opinions they disagree with, but it doesn’t have to be constantly, and it doesn’t have to be when they’re already stressed or tired, for the sake of their mental health.

      • MimicJar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I wouldn’t classify every monolingual person as trapped in an echo chamber

        Simply being something isn’t an echo chamber, you have to have a thought or opinion being shared by the group. If every person you interact with only speaks one language, and they all share that one language is the best method of communication, that’s an echo chamber.

        Use social media how you like

        I agree. Although it is useful to be aware of your own biases.

        the solution to echo chambers is going outside and touching grass not forcing yourself to interact with every community on the internet.

        Assuming you don’t mean literally “touch grass”, the solution is seeking out opinions/thoughts outside of your echo chamber. That doesn’t necessarily mean forcing yourself to interact with terrible communities, but being aware and understanding (but not agreeing with) them.

        Although I again refer to using social media how you like is fine. No one needs to be exposed to certain communities. It’s not wrong or lazy or bad to ignore certain communities or viewpoints, especially toxic ones. However you should be aware that they exist and it can be helpful, if you choose, to understand where they come from.

        As a harmless example, if you don’t like brussel sprouts and none of your friends like brussel sprouts, it may benefit you to try brussel sprouts or to seek out and talk to or read about people who like brussel sprouts. You can still at the end of the day dislike brussel sprouts. You don’t have to change your opinion. But now your opinion is more well rounded.

  • EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 minutes ago

    And what we’ve learned about trump cultists is that echo chambers are fabulous.

  • fievel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I think a bit the opposite: I’m really worried about the trend to give people only information they care about. I think it’s essential to be able to have information about everything. Of course there will always be stuff you don’t care about but having it automatically filtered out is dangerous in my opinion. In GAFA-powered social networks, you are only given pieces of information about your own opinion, you never have something that make you question yourself about your opinion. The power of independent and open media like Lemmy is to not rely on such biasing algorithms.

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You don’t have to use filters, just like you don’t have to subscribe to subreddits on Reddit. You can just use the default front page if you are afraid of tailoring it to your tastes.

  • arrakark@10291998.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I think it attracts a certain type of person to Lemmy in the first place; someone who would have probably used the original Reddit back in the day

  • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    How do you filter out an entire instance as a single user? I was just trying to figure that out the other day, but it didn’t appear possible.

    • weariedfae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Not sure how to on desktop but I use Connect and it’s in the menu options of posts. Super easy to block individuals, communities, and instances.

  • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I haven’t thought about how that works.

    If other instance users post on a problematic instance by accident or because there’s a useful community, I wouldn’t want those hidden.

    Then again if it, preferably, only hides the users of the problematic instance, that doesn’t really solve the core issue of bad actors being enabled in the fediverse 🤔

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Trust me, as someone who has been through this process, they manage to drive away all the normies pretty quickly.

  • lulztard@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    So far I find it to be nonsense. Call the US a terrorist nation for couping democratically elected leader in favour of dictators for over a hundred years, get downvoted and banned by amerophiles. Call China or Russia terrorist nations for literal genocide, wars and international strongman bullying, get downvoted and banned by tankies.

    Can’t say retard because that’s a slur but idiot is fine despite it meaning the absolutely same thing, also calling someone slow but in french is also fine.

    People are so hardcore pro privacy would literally rather see child rapists go free and child porn platforms stay online, than to have to tolerate the police scan outgoing connections for a specific IP for three days.

    Lemmy feels more and more like extremist echo chambers without any actual discourse or exchange.

    • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      No, your reasoning, understanding of a topic and way of talking is just dumb. Get rid if that paranoia of everyone bullying you. Don’t go into threads of your political opposite and then be surprised to get flogged. Don’t brush of everyone disagreeing with you as “they are all the same and equally bad”. Stop ignoring authoritarian abusing power and wake up from you fantasy dream world where you believe this doesn’t happen. Once you’ve given up some of your rights, it’s really hard to get them back. No one is defending pedo platforms, it’s about our lifes and knowledge that these surveillance tools will fuck up normal people. It just takes one stupid vote to get the fascists into power and a whole country can move into a dictatorship. If you fail to see this, your very naiv and need to study more history content.

      You’re not wrong in criticizing the US, people who look at them objectively should obviously see the many flaws. But as with guns , the US is very patriotic and it’s difficult to argue against. But getting someone to realize and fix their own bias is another difficult topic.

    • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      the US a terrorist nation for couping democratically elected leader in favour of dictators for over a hundred years

      Is this really true?

      • weariedfae@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Yeah CIA likes to overthrow foreign governments, some democratically elected, and destabilize nations. They say they don’t do it anymore but who knows. It’s pretty public knowledge.

        Edit: I live in America and it’s like that thing where you can talk shit about your own family.

        • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          37 minutes ago

          I meant the “for over a hundred years” part specifically, I bolded it but it’s not as noticeable as it should be.

          • weariedfae@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            18 minutes ago

            oh yeah for sure. Dude they orchestrated a coup and took over Hawaii in the like 1800s.

            Plus I think there was fuckery in Latin America even back then.