Hello I’m not a person who is affected by this community moderator but I’m posting on behalf of people who are, since they don’t seem to know of this community yet. I attempted to reach some via DM but I’m not sure they’ll respond. So I’m making this post since I feel this needs to be addressed.

Recently I was made aware of a community that appeared randomly on Lemmy.world. It seems to be a troll community given the type of content, but the reason I’m posting about it here specifically is that this mod seems to be banning anyone who points this out or goes against his narrative. Furthermore he is only using the autoremove on ban function, not removing any content the users have posted, which I believe is deliberate in attempt to prevent the content from showing up under the modlog and revealing the hypocrisy.


Some samples of comments:

Comment from: @[email protected]

Everything else you posted has been pretty cringe but what he fuck is up with this one, dude lol

comment from: @[email protected]

free software is SLOWING DOWN tech advancement??? WHAT???

comment from: @[email protected]

i genuinely do not understand your point

comment from: @[email protected]

First off, nice new community. I look forward to days of quality posts such as this./s

Second, how many Linux distros have this level of data collection, and what is their estimated market share?

Original comment link


All of these were retrieved from the API, even though they aren’t included in the modlogs, I could’ve included more but it’s kind of a time consuming process to look for them and retrieve them. Viewing removed comments is easier on Lemmy than it is on Reddit but it still isn’t easy.

What do you guys think, does this seem like power-tripping? Also does this person’s content seem like blatant troll content?

CC: @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]

People who’s comments I mentioned, I CCed them so they know I did this on their behalf

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    This is an example of a community I don’t subscribe to, because I’m not the target demographic.

    I think a Linux sucks community should exist, it can exist, and if the moderator wants to remove anything about Linux not sucking that’s fine too. The way this moderator is doing it, they should just turn on mod only posting.

    I looked at the community sidebar, and one of the community rules is no promoting Linux, no defending Linux, so at least it’s consistent

    Lemmy needs a diverse set of voices.

    Counterexample: if I go into fuck cars and talk about vehicles in any positive fashion, I’m going to get dog piled and probably banned

    • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      I’ve actually been fairly fine in fuck cars, both Reddit and Lemmy editions. I actually like cars, well, some of them anyway.

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        The difference between [email protected] and linuxsucks is that the first one is largely a fact and logic based community about the problems with car dependency in urban areas, and car-dependent infrastructure.

        linuxsucks is a single troll who’s talking shit about linux for seemingly no real reason, some of his posts are insanely illogical, and make very little sense. So yeah I definitely think these communities are anything like each other.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          I don’t think you want to create an expectation that communities have to be logical and open to reasoned debate. That’s a lot of work to enforce

    • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      I think that there are key differences between

      • A community criticising something, backed up by reason and evidence. Even if it’s something popular, doubly true if there’s a circlejerk around that thing. This can and should exist.
      • A community created to circlejerk against something, through insane troll “logic” and silencing any dissidence. This is fertile grounds for idiocy and misinformation, thus harmful for the society [I can go further on that if desired] and the Fediverse [ditto], and should not exist.

      Sometimes the boundary between both is not clear - but this community, unless it’s a troll comm, falls cleanly into the second case. Specially given how opaque the moderator is trying to be (check how none of the removals appear in the modlog).