• Delta_V@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I think this take is mid.

    A doctor pulling in $400k a year is still working class. Even if they somehow managed to save 100% of their income, and invest it all in a portfolio that consistently grows 10% each year, and do so from age 18 to 65, then when they retire at 65 they would still not have even half of 1 billion dollars.

    The truly rich, the billionaires, can “make” that much in a few days, without having to work for it.

    I would prefer to tax the 1% until they’re working class again before we talk about taxing the top earning people who actually work for it.

    • absGeekNZ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      While that is an interesting take, it is possible to do both!

      • flying_mechanic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        They never said it wasn’t, just that we should start with the 1% and only once they are back down to a realistic wealth level do we start taxing people who are working class. At a decent pay rate (100k/yr) a million is achievable over a career, a billion is not and can only be had through consolidation of wealth.