Please don’t think I’m here to complain about rizz or skibidi toilet etc. Thats all fine by me.

The term I dislike strongly is ‘eeeh’ before you make a statement disagreeing with someone. (This is over text only). Now maybe I’ve been pavloved bc it’s always used by someone disagreeing. But I’m happy with people disagreeing with me normally its just the ‘eeeh’ or ‘erm’ that annoys me.

So what’s a random term that annoys you?

PS. Saying “eeeh actually ‘eeh’ is a perfectly fine term” would be a ridiculously easy joke and I will judge you for making it. And I know atleast one person will. Especially bow that I’ve said all this.

  • CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    6 days ago

    Especially in news headlines: slams, blasts, mind-blowing, hack (or lifehack)

    I’m sure there are others, but that’s all my brain can handle at the moment.

  • MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    “The proof is in the pudding.” It makes zero sense! The actual adage is, “The proof of the pudding is in the eating.” It means that a dessert can look perfect and enticing, but if the cook used salt instead of sugar it will taste disgusting.

    I don’t know what people even think they’re saying with “the proof is in the pudding”.

  • DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    More of a grammatical mistake, but “should of” instead of “should’ve” or “should have” annoys the hell out of me for some reason. I completely get how people make the mistake, but it’s more effort than just typing it correctly.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m also sick of it, but I also sort of like how it’s gone viral. I had a very non-techy friend mention it to me the other day. I feel like most of the people who I see talking about it are jazzed because it makes them feel seen. My friend, for example, said to me that before she learned of “enshittification”, she felt like she was going mad because of how things don’t seem to work like they used to, especially in tech; she said that for the longest time, she had assumed it must be something that she was doing wrong.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 days ago

      Marxists have a hundred years of text dedicated to alienation from labor, the falling rate of profit, degeneration of art and creative disciplines under later capitalism due to the profit motive, cycles of class struggle, all based on a materialist analysis of changing production and class relationsi

      But for some reason a trendy term like enshittification that vaguely means things are getting worse, without going into the basis about why they’re currently getting worse, has caught on.

      I’m convinced it’s part of the tech grifter trend to take things that were already invented, slap a new name on it, repackage it, and sell it.

      • rainynight65@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I suggest you read up a bit on how and by whom the term was coined and what it actually means. It’s by no means ‘vague’ and it is also a bit more than just repackaging and selling something already known. I suspect many people using the term aren’t even fully aware of what it describes and, crucially, what is being proposed to reduce the effects it describes.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      But yet it explains so much about the modern world. All this time we’ve been abused and mistreated, had our data collected and income extracted in so many scammy ways …… and now we have a word that fits it so perfectly

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    6 days ago

    “Ding ding ding!” When someone agrees with something you wrote, but wants to make sure that you know that they already knew and claim ownership of the statement that you wrote. Condesending asshole. I did not arrive at your opinion late.

    “Meanwhile” in cooking recipes. Just no. I am following a recipe in stepwise order. You do not get to tell me what I should have already done in the previous step.

    • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 days ago

      The entire way recipes are written is trash.

      “Add the flour and stir gently”: How much flour? Why do I have to scroll back up to check?!

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        It makes sense to have the ingredients first for making a shopping list and prepping. However, I do agree, with recipes being online, it should be a small task to include the quantity in the description too, even if it is adjustable for different servings.

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Normally, portioning out the ingredients would be the first step of the process and is all done at once.

        • SatyrSack@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          Probably not normally, but ideally. I doubt mise en place is all that common in most homes.

            • howrar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              I bake quite a bit and I don’t do my mise-en-place either when it comes to baking, but that’s not a problem. The way recipes are formatted works well for my process as well. I read through the steps ahead of time if it’s a recipe I am unfamiliar with, then I’ll just have the ingredients list open while I’m doing the prep. The things I make are pretty basic (cookies, cakes, muffin, etc) and the steps are all identical. Mix wet, mix dry, mix everything, bake.

              I personally find that having less repeated information makes things easier and faster to read. The recipe says “add flour”, you know that it’s all the flour. If the recipe says “add flour (1 cup)”, then I have to check back in the ingredients list to figure out if that’s all the flour or only part of it. Then the more info you add to clarify, the harder it is to skim while you’re cooking.

              • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                I agree that many recipes are poorly written. Especially non professional stuff from the web.

                Still, I’d hate to prepare anything without having weighed all my ingredients beforehand.

          • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 days ago

            As much as I despise the fat-tongued mockney, Jamie Oliver’s website is the only one I’ve seen that has the ingredients and method on two tabs so you can flick between them

            Dunno why they’re not all like that

  • grid11@lemy.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    Never mind I found it

    …took the effort to nvm-d the post, but did not share how, where, or what etc

  • Bilb!@lem.monster
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    “Hence why”

    Syntactically makes no sense. Just say “that’s why,” that’s what you are trying to say.

  • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 days ago

    I cringe so hard at the twitterist carebear-hugbox way of smugly claiming the intellectual high ground and shaming somebody:

    “Be better.” or “Do better.”

    The sentiment isn’t terrible, but it’s prevalent use is obviously just dripping with arrogance and thrown out in the most petty ways. Ugh!

    • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      They’re the same types that appear in comment threads with contradictory arguments to literally fucking anything -

      “We should save the whales”

      “Yes but my cousin got splashed by a whale on a boat trip as a toddler and now has a terrible phobia that makes her wheeze whenever she sees one. Do you want that, is that what you want?”

      “We should plan walkable cities”

      “OH MY GOD SHES IN A WHEELCHAIR TOO DO YOU ONLY EVER THINK ABOUT YOURSELF YOU ABLEIST”

      😂

      My theory is that they’re just unbelievably bo-o-o-o-oring, humourless people with nothing to add to a conversation but a desperate need for attention

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        The wheelchair one (whilst obvious hyperbole) is a great example of why this rhetoric isn’t useful.

        Often people who say we should plan walkable cities don’t consider what that would mean for wheelchair users and other disabled people, because they don’t have the lived experience to think along those lines. So it would actually be super useful if someone could say “okay, but what about wheelchair users?” in a constructive way, because there are additional considerations re: pedestrianisation and public transport. Disabled people are way too often treated like an inconvenience or obstacles to progress, and that’s fucking exhausting, so it’s useful to have allies who ask “hey, what about disabled people tho”

        The people your comment is about don’t do this. As you highlight, they make things about themselves, and if anything, this makes it harder to have productive conversations about what a ‘walkable city’ for everyone would look like. I suspect that for many of these people, it’s based on a nugget of good intentions inside a blob of insecurity and dread at the state of the world; they feel like they’re not doing enough so they resort to very loudly virtue signalling in the most bizarre ways.

        • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          See?

          The “whilst obvious hyperbole” bit is the clue. The two situations/comments/opinions are just examples, never happened and never will

          It wouldn’t have mattered what examples I’d made up, someone like you would come along and go “wELL aKShULLy”

          Fucksake!

          • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            My dude, I’m agreeing with you

            Edit: effectively I was saying that I agree with you that there seems to be a particular kind of person who is overly contrarian, very loud and impossible to have productive discussions with.

            I felt like the wheelchair example you picked was a great example of how this happens “in the wild”. I wanted to build on your comment by using that example to elaborate on how these contrarian types cause harm, even if they might seem to be concerned and well-intentioned. I found the wheelchair example to be a good one because it is actually something that I’ve seen happen multiple times.

            I feel that your reply is an unfair characterisation of my comment. Given how the internet’s communication norms can prime us to read and respond to things in an overly adversarial manner (especially as it’s clear from your original comment that you’ve got way too much experience with silly argumentative types, so I sympathise), I am hoping that your response was based on a misinterpretation of my comment and/or me being insufficiently clear in what I originally wrote (apologies if so).

  • 0ops@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    I do the “eh” thing sometimes without thinking about it but I agree with you, I don’t like being on the other end of it either. I’m trying to work on that

  • Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    6 days ago

    Mama, momma, mommas…

    “Hey Facebook mommas, I’ve got a question about…”

    I don’t know why, but it annoys the shit out of me.

    • Uli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 days ago

      Similarly, not a fan of when teachers and parents talk about their “kiddos.”

      Feels like they’re needlessly using a more playful childish term to make themselves part of a separate “in group” who “gets it.”

      • Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        I hadn’t thought about that one. I occasionally use the word kiddo, but only to say, “hey kiddo!” I never use it to talk about my kids, like “we took the kiddos to the park yesterday.”

        • Uli@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Yeah, it’s specifically the not talking to a kid version that bothers me.

          I pick up a subtext of self-importance and I think that’s what I find irksome. A mom is a parent. A momma is a special parent who will do anything for their baby, you’d better watch out. A kid is a child. A kiddo is a specific child who has a close bond with their momma or teacher that you wouldn’t understand. That’s the vibe I get.

      • Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        I don’t think it’s some latent psychological issue. I get along great with my mom, and I’ve never felt any resentment toward her. I’m also not bothered by words like mom, moms, mother, etc. I don’t even mind when my sons call my wife “mommy.” It’s just that one word, “momma,” that bugs me. I wish I had an explanation.