So I went to check in online, and it asked me to check some boxes for what luggage I wanted to bring on board. I did, and it told me that to carry on both a backpack and a roller bag it’ll be $45, or $65 if I try to play games and they have to check stuff at the gate.

I said fuck that, and unchecked some boxes. It said I couldn’t check in without putting a credit card on file, that they would charge if there were any issues and they wound up needing to charge me for my luggage. It wouldn’t let me continue without putting a credit card on file and checking a box that said they could charge me for my luggage, if they felt it was excessive.

I said fuck that and decided to check in at the airport. I threw all my stuff in a backpack to remove any wiggle room, and the kiosk said the same thing. I talked to one of the people, and she said it’s a new policy. I pointed out that I paid for my ticket, she could see I had only a backpack, and I wanted to get in the airplane. She told me to go talk to the guy at the end.

I talked to the guy at the end, politely, and eventually he printed a boarding pass for me. But you should know they’re up to some bullshit.

  • jrubal1462@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    I learned this about United this summer. Except the language they used didn’t specifically rule out roller bags, it called them “full-sized carryon”. I showed up with a checked bag and a small carryon. The desk agent told me wheels make it a “full-sized” regardless of the dimensions. Fortunately, I was able to stuff a bunch of stuff a bunch of my crap into my checked SCUBA bag, and repack my regs and underwear into the backpack I was bringing anyways.

    Note: This was on an International flight so I REALLY didn’t appreciate feeling like I was flying on a budget airline.

      • jrubal1462@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Lol, Hilarious and justified but I get quite compliant around people who could stand between me and a SCUBA/ bachelor party trip.

    • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Thank you for your comment, I was confused what people are complaining about (you’ve had to pay for carry on items since ~2008, which have always been different than a “personal item” which is like a backpack or tote bag that you can bring for free if you store under the seat in front of you). It sounded like people weren’t understanding what a personal item was vs a carry on. But if they are arbitrarily saying wheels, regardless of size, also determine personal item vs carryon, I can see the frustration.

      But otherwise their policy has been like this for a super long time - pay for carry on, and if you pay at the gate they charge extra. Almost 20 years now.

      That being said I hold a grudge against all airlines for charging you a fee to pick your seat. They used to let you just pick it as a perk for booking online. Now they even have to nickel and dime our fucking loved one’s emotional support while we pray that the plane doesn’t fucking fall apart and while we breathe in the germs of some stranger next to us. Airlines are assholes.

      Eta: airline fun fact - the CIA used to own an airline (this is verified by the CIA’s website itself)

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_America_(airline)

  • fhqwgads@possumpat.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    After having to fly United a bunch of times this summer, they changed the names of the tickets and invented a new “no one wants that” tier.

    There’s now standard economy which is what everyone’s used to and gives you a “personal item” (i.e. a backpack or a purse) and a “carry on item”, and basic economy which only includes the personal item. They mention it on their website, but on third party websites its not quite as obvious which ticket you’re getting.

    It has been a nightmare - on every single flight there’s a crowd of people pissed that they aren’t allowed a carry on with their ticket, with them having to run halfway across the airport to upgrade their tickets or pay 3x as much for a bag they thought was included.

    If you’re being charitable, it’s a roundabout discount on checked bags to fix the problem they invented by charging for checked bags and then sucking at handling them. Every single flight I took had them asking for people to check their carry on for free because the bins were going to be overloaded, and it seems like they want to incentivize actually checking a bag again.

    I started instantly asking them to gate check my carry on (for free) because honestly, the airport experience is way nicer when you don’t have to deal with your luggage all the time. If you check 1 bag as a couple you might even save money, and if you’re alone it might be worth the difference to not have to worry about only having two pairs of pants on your three week trip.

    More realistically they want to normalize having to pay for carry on the same way they did checked bags, and they are trying to sneak around that by starting with only their new BS economy tier. Wouldn’t surprise me if they got rid of “basic” and just made carry on a “business class” or whatever amenity.

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s basic economics in its ugly application.

      Usually, the people who are buying stuff come in different tiers: The people who want to pay the least at all cost, people who are careless enough to get fleeced out of a few dollars for the same crappy product if paying less is difficult, and people who are willing to pay a premium for really good stuff. There’s an art to structuring your service to catch all of the tiers, and make sure that they’re all going to pay the highest price they will accept, and I think “basic economy” is a new technological development in drawing a more effective distinction between tiers 1 and 2.

      What makes it ugly is that they’re designing deliberately punitive features into the service to push people up into tier 2 who would otherwise be going on Kayak and just clicking the “cheapest” button. If you have any willingness to pay $40 more, they want it. They’re going to put you to the test a little bit, to make sure that you’re committed to the lowest price, and then if so they’re going to punish you a little for it, while still taking your money.

      American and United are now both on the no-fly list for me, I think. I may have to see what airlines are decent, when you fly them one tier up.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I wish flying was affordable. My girlfriend lives in Korea and it’s going to cost her 2k to come see my family in Canada in December. This is nearly double what she paid in 2017 for the same trip, and while it’s not prohibitively expensive, it’s deterrently expensive

  • Klear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I read that as “United States” and the headline only started to look suspicious with the word “passengers”.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Airlines are assholes and they keep getting worse. We’re at the end of the stage of capitalism where things seem somewhat ok sometimes and maybe good if you’re lucky. Everything is going to be awful and terrible to increasing degrees from here on.

  • shplane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I stopped flying United when they beat the shit out of one of their passengers and dragged him off the plane

    • irreticent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      For those unfamiliar with that incident:

      On April 9, 2017, at Chicago O’Hare International Airport, four paying customers were selected to be involuntarily deplaned from United Express Flight 3411 to make room for four deadheading employees. One of these passengers was David Dao, 69, a Vietnamese-American who was injured when he was physically assaulted and forcefully removed from the flight by Chicago Department of Aviation Security officers. Dao, a pulmonologist, refused to leave his seat when directed because he needed to see patients the following day. In the process of removing him, the security officers struck his face against an armrest, then dragged him – bloodied, bruised, and unconscious – by his arms down the aircraft aisle, past rows of onlooking passengers. The incident is widely characterized by critics – and later by United Airlines itself – as an example of mishandled customer service.

        • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          7 days ago

          No, because United employees didn’t beat the passenger up, the police did. That’s not even remotely close to the worst thing that cops have gotten away with.

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            7 days ago

            i thought that wasn’t actually police

            Following a review prompted by the incident, in July 2017 the Chicago Department of Aviation reported that its unsworn, unarmed airport security personnel were not actually police officers under Illinois law. Their uniforms, badges and vehicles had been “improperly” labeled “police” for historical reasons. It promised that the incorrect insignia would be removed within months.

  • meco03211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Obligatory “fuck United”.

    They fucked up my vacation a number of years ago and I have since sworn them off. The most generous interpretation of the incident is that I missed an email updating a time change and arrived at the airport after the flight had left. Their next flight wasn’t until the next morning. My wife and I were looking and there was a flight from a different airline that would have cost them $400 each to book for us (they wouldn’t refund us so we could purchase that separately). The first agent at the counter completely understood our request but simply didn’t have the authority to make that decision. So she got a supervisor. The supervisor did that annoying ass thing where they listen to your request and then restate it in objectively different terms to sound unreasonable. In the end they covered a hotel for the night and gave us $550 each in travel vouchers and lost a customer for life. So they ended up paying way more and lost a customer than had they not fucked around from the start. Had they paid the $400 from the beginning, we’d have given them much higher preference on our future flights which have been many.

  • BlueLineBae@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    I used to fly united quite a bit and it used to be pretty good. But these days my options for flying for work are united, delta, and southwest and I usually choose delta because they don’t charge you for shit and you can have both an overhead carry on and a small bag plus free internet on the plane. In the end they’re all shit, but I’m going to pick the lesser of the shits each time. Same reason I have Comcast internet.

      • noride@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        Same for me, and as shitty as Comcast has been in other places, I’ve had only two non-power related outages with them in almost 7 years here. I think their service quality varies not only state by state, but even county to county in some places.

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 days ago

      Same reason I have Comcast internet.

      You lost me. I was with you right up until that point, but then you went off the deep end.

      • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        As a happy Comcast customer, my old ISP still only sells plans up to 100 Mbps and it routes all traffic through a city that’s over 200 miles away.

      • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        7 days ago

        As a begrudging Comcast customer myself, allow me to explain. They are the least shitty option because the only alternatives in my area are 5G and Verizon DSL. Verizon DSL has a max download speed less than 1mbps.

        So yeah, I use Comcast. And I hate it.

      • BlueLineBae@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        My choices are AT&T and Comcast. Both are shitty and treat you equally shitty, but Comcast actually works most of the time ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Basic economy simply isn’t worth it. They nickel and dime you with all the BS fees. And the credit card thing is total bullshit, too. They do it because they want to make sure they have your card on file in order to sell you overpriced snack boxes and charge them to your seat.

    Once I had to buy a poor lady some crackers because she was on the last leg of a flight from Asia and hasn’t eaten anything, but the stewardess couldn’t take her money unless she had set up her CC ahead of time.

    I fly United often enough for work that I have some status, so I’m one of the entitied snobs who board first and hog all the overhead space.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Agreed, similar situation for me. United is not for non status travelers.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        They also push their credit card with Chase. It has a $99 yearly fee, but gives you a free checked bag and lets you into Boarding Group 2 without needing extra status, which has an okay chance of having enough overhead for a carry-on. If you intend to fly United more than once in a year with a checked bag, but not enough to get status, it can make more sense to get the card.

        It kind of sucks to have to play those games, but that’s Capitalism.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          I’ll go one further, my employer reimbursed me for the 500 a year united card with the lounge access. It’s insane how much easier airline travel is with a quiet place to wait/rest as well as a “free” available passable meal and coffee you don’t have to wait in line for.

          • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            Oh. The lounge.

            I don’t care which airline it is; the lounge is so great. I don’t need some cakes and cookies, but a place to sit in peace is amazing.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      It might could be worth it if you’re doing a shorter flight and just don’t have baggage but that’s rare.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    I refuse to fly domestically anymore just because the TSA is all security theater, I refuse to go through their backscatter x-ray, and I’m not interested in their enhanced groping. I will ride my motorcycle 1000 miles in a single day rather than take a plane anywhere.

    • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Same. Flying has become such a terrible experience that I refuse to take part in it anymore. With the overbooking resulting in people getting kicked off planes, price-gouging customers, constantly late flights, stranding people without compensation, people packed in so tight that no one is comfortable, lack of cleanliness, constitutional rights violations, stealing luggage and items in luggage, violations of people’s bodies…I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to call it cruelty to the passengers.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        It is neither Dean nor Sam.

        Besides, a motorcycle is far more fuel efficient; I typically get about 40-45mpg, v. 12mpg for a '67 Impala.

    • candybrie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 days ago

      They phased out back scatter x-ray like a decade ago. They only use millimeter wave, which doesn’t have ionizing radiation.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Regardless; the TSA was caught lying about the capabilities of the machines, and I’m just not willing to step foot through one. The ionizing radiation doesn’t worry me, because I was never flying frequently enough for it to be an issue.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I will ALWAYS get the grope if I avoid the cancer box.

      I have a deep-seated fear of the cancer box. I was okay with it - I get x-rays a bit for ongoing Achilles issues - until I learned that when Boston TSA asked the FAA what the risks are of standing nearby it for hours at a time, the response was

      No.  We're not telling. STFU & GBtW. 
      

      That’s when I decided I’d like to avoid it.

      What I’ve learned:

      • sometimes they’re bored and don’t wanna do it so they’ll wave you through an arch and you’re out.
      • don’t call it a cancer box to an obvious type-a failed-cop TSA agent or you’ll have a discussion you’ll want to get out of quickly
      • sometimes they want to be dinks. If you have any shame - not me, ex-army - it may not be comfy to show a dad-bod to the other passengers. Take the hazing.
      • usually they roll their eyes and call the noob over and it’s a perfunctory process.

      So there.

      • teuto@lemmy.teuto.icu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 days ago

        I used to work in a job that involved handling radioactive materials. We had dosimeter badges to track long term exposure to radiation. One pass through the full body scanner at a TSA checkpoint would make the dosimeter badge come back from the lab at greater than monthly allowable exposure. I’ll take the grope.

          • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            It’s very hard for me to care if cancer rates for TSA agents go through the roof; they willingly signed up for that shit, so fuck 'em.

            • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Let’s be fair.

              They signed up to be the lowest of the overly-entitled rentacops out there. that’s on them.

              They didn’t sign up to get irradiated by some shady shit that the FCC is all “no. Fuck off” about when asked about safety concerns.

              So let’s render unto Caesar on this one. The FCC (FAA? I may have that wrong) are huge dinks for knowingly subjecting their people to rads way in excess of what’s cool – worse if you look at the TSA people and realize they aren’t pasty-whites and then it’s mean to minorities.

              And Logan intl are dinks, just like whatever union the TSA people are in, for not supporting and protecting the staff. That lawsuit is gonna be like Erin Brockovich II .

              And this just reminds you that if they could get other jobs then they will. The people who can’t dead-sea-effect out of there are gonna be absolutely unemployable elsewhere. And that fills me with a warm and fuzzy feeling about the mental capacity and happiness of TSA agents and their international emulants.

              • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                They signed up to be the lowest of the overly-entitled rentacops out there. that’s on them.

                Exactly my point.

                The FCC (FAA? I may have that wrong)

                I’m pretty sure that the TSA falls under the Dept. of Homeland Security, as does Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

                realize they aren’t pasty-whites and then it’s mean to minorities.

                You see that makes it worse, right? You’ve got a lot of non-white people signing up for the job of a rent-a-cop so that they can abuse the same kind of authority that is leveled against the populations that the job attracts. It’s like a black kid on the south side of Chicago looking at the ways that CPD abuses suspects and say, goddamn, how do I get into that gig?

                And this just reminds you that if they could get other jobs then they will.

                Eh. Maybe some of them. Maybe. But policing attracts a specific kind of person that wants that job; sometimes it’s people that are genuinely white knights, but they generally get run out pretty fast. More often it’s people that want authority. Given that TSA pay ain’t great, and that we’re in an era–temporarily, if Trump wins–of historic high employment, I don’t think that too many of the people in the TSA are really stuck there.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Same.

      I will road trip or take a train instead of flying. I’d rather be on the road twelve hours than in a plane for one.

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 days ago

    That’s some budget airline behavior. If they want to do tha, they should price their flights accordingly.

  • realitista@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yeah they’ve gotten really weird about forcing you to use their app and put a credit card on it constantly. Really annoying.

  • CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Its a good thing this hold over from immediately after the attacks on 9/11 happened is still in effect or the terrorist might have won.

    Not to hijack the thread but which airlines is least likely to put you on a plane made by boeing?

    • teuto@lemmy.teuto.icu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      For US carriers off the top of my head, Spirit and frontier are all airbus fleets. Allegiant has one 737 in their fleet I think and is otherwise Airbus. JetBlue and Breeze have no Boeing products. All the big airlines have lots of Boeing products.

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Usually European companies prefer Airbus. Lufthansa is usually a safe bet.

      US companies? Best of luck.

        • Nighed@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          shorthaul or longhaul?

          I think its about 50% on Europe to Europe flights

          • seaQueue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            That matches with our experience from the US to the EU. Long haul is about 50/50 IIRC, you have to hunt a little bit to be sure the flights you book are Airbus

            • seaQueue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              You have to check each flight for long haul. My SO did a round trip from the US west coast to Germany recently for work and something like 2/3 of the Lufthansa flights were Airbus, the rest were Boeing

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        We’ve had mixed results with Lufthansa. It was absolutely stellar but they’ve had their share of avoidable sadness.

        We like icelandair now because of (normally) the overnight stop near keflavik and they’re usually really pleasant people.