What an utter piece of shit.

    • jarfil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s like the rule of money, but with nukes: those who have the money/nukes, make the rules.

      • deadtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        155
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not anymore. They gave them to Russia under guarantees they wouldt do… pretty much everything they are doing right now.

        I’m starting to think Russia might not be trustworthy…

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          36
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, in the mid 90s the world was so optimistic about Russia, and frankly reassured about the nukes going to Russia, which was believed to be the more confidently governed nation state.

          Everyone was still riding high on the cold war seemingly coming to a close.

        • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          88
          ·
          1 year ago

          Too bad so sad! Should have been smart like Kim Jong. Keep some nukes and you don’t get invaded.

        • kava@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think he addressed it clearly enough. Russia invading Ukraine has no risk of Ukraine starting a nuclear war. Why? Because Ukraine does not have nukes.

          A country like Russia, if facing an existential threat, has the capacity and incentive to use nuclear weapons. Why? Because they have nukes.

          This is why even the US had hesitations last year (same time this Starlink episode happened) about sending certain types of weapons to Ukraine - out of fear of nuclear escalation. Now that Ukraine has drone striked Russian territory a few times it seems obvious because nuclear escalation hasn’t happened… but Musk was not alone in thinking this. Remember that US refused to give all sorts of weaponry at first. They didn’t want to give fighters jets, tanks, etc.

    • Grant_M@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes. Assisting putler’s genocide against Ukrainian children is a war crime.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah. According to the article, he straight up told the top military brass of the Biden administration right afterwards and they did nothing. No prosecution, no whistle-blowing to the press about a war crime. Nothing.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Prosecute him, of course! Maybe hit him with sanctions for directly supporting the Russian war effort? Because that’s what stopping an attack on their fleet is.

                • olympicyes@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Krolden is asking specifically what crime he should be charged with, implying you would struggle to find one. This certainly isn’t treason against the US because the US is not legally involved in the war. It’s unclear from their post whether they support Ukraine or Russia in the conflict so I’d suggest taking it at face value.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        53
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        So if you’re not an American you’re free to sabotage the US as much as you want and it’s not a crime?

        • jarfil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          So if you’re not an American you’re free to sabotage the US as much as you want and it’s not a crime?

          Two points.

          First, US laws apply on US soil, or to US citizens. If you’re neither, then cooperation and extradition agreements apply, if there are any.

          Second, not sure where you got the “sabotage the US” part from:

          • the request came from Ukraine
          • from the beginning, Musk has been sabotaging Russia by disabling Starlink outside of Ukrainian borders, this was supported by both Ukraine and the US
          • the Ukrainian request was for removing part of the sabotage so Ukraine could attack Russia with Ukrainian drones
          • it wasn’t a US request, it didn’t involve any US assets, or any US operations

          Maybe Ukraine should have asked the US, instead of asking a private non-Ukrainian citizen.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            First, US laws apply on US soil, or to US citizens. If you’re neither, then cooperation and extradition agreements apply, if there are any.

            Yup, and the US charges non-citzens that are not on their soil all the time. If they can’t get the extradition there’s nothing they can do about it unless the person sets foot on US soil, but that doesn’t stop it from being a criminal offence or from the person being charged.

            Second, not sure where you got the “sabotage the US” part from

            It was an analogy. The person I was replying to seemed to be saying “It can’t be a criminal offence because Musk isn’t Ukranian” which is nonsense. I assumed they where likely American and used an example of something closer to home to show why that is incorrect.

          • Digitalprimate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            First, US laws apply on US soil, or to US citizens. If you’re neither, then cooperation and extradition agreements apply, if there are any.

            No, this is demonstrably false in many areas of law.

            For example OFAC explicitly targets non US persons and organizations in sanctions enforcement. It is explicitly written into nearly every presidential order authorizing sanctions. I’d be happy to direct you to a few if you like, but you can just pick any from here: https://ofac.treasury.gov

        • sergih@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah but it’s not called treason, treason is to your own country, ofc this is still an illegal offense in Ukraine but I don’t think it’s treason?

  • iyaerP@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    158
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    If he loves Russia so much, we should deport him there, and nationalize all his assets since SpaceX is a critical security apparatus and he’s clearly the foreign agent of a hostile power.

    • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No no, give him to Ukrain, where they can charge and try him. Hopefully end up with life in prison or something better (worse?). Giving him to Russia just makes him more of a Russian asset.

      • instamat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or OR we ask him to emerge from the Black Sea in his swim trunks to beguile both sides with his majestic beauty and raw sexuality, thereby ending the conflict and bringing peace to the region

        • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Of value or not, he needs to be trotted out in front of Ukrainian justice. Giving him a free pass to live with his Russian buddies is NOT justice and is not a deterrent for others who would also practice such treachery. Stop trying to save him, you Russian sympathizer.

  • Hiccup@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    169
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Elon is not the president, a leader, the military, nor a government. This parasite should be in a prison or a brig at the very least. This is fucking treason.

    • Arsenal4ever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      He controls 10K satellites, the electric car charging infrastructure, and a massive global communications platform. He’s too big to control. Good thing we hero-worshipped him for years. 🫢 🤭

    • dellish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve heard this a bit. Treason is a crime against your own country, no? How is this treason?

      • blue_zephyr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        He’s twarthing the war effort of a country the US is supporting. I don’t know if he broke any laws but he’s defenitely on the government’s shitlist now.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          he’s definitely on the government’s shitlist now

          A billionaire who donates shitloads to both of the corporations masquerading as political parties? On the US government’s shitlist? Oh you sweet summer child…

      • BigNote@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not. His actions can be deplorable without actually being illegal. The Lemmy Bar Association is about as legally competent as my cat.

      • Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So if during the occupation of Afghanistan, I fought for the Taliban but only killed Afghan Army soldiers, I could return to the USA without any worries?

        Giving comfort to the enemy has a name, what is it again?

        • crackajack@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          US is not at war with Russia so it is not treason.

          Jeez, people in this thread are hysterical.

            • jarfil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              If Russia wants to be at war with the US, they can issue a war declaration.

              They haven’t so far, and they know why.

          • Thewheeeeeeeeeel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nato is in war with russia. We train soldier, we send equipment, we give intelligence…If this is not being in a war I dont know…

            • crackajack@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              US is in a proxy war-- totally different to an actual war. Was the Soviet Union at war with the US when the former funded and trained North Vietnam during the Vietnam War?

                • crackajack@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Of course people would say that. As much as I dislike Elon, he can’t be charged for treason because the US is not at war. The best that the US and allies could do is break contract with him or isolate him politically. But he’s rich and well connected so I doubt anything will happen to him.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fucking charge him with something. This is insane… If it’s not treason, it sure as hell is undermining the billions of dollars in aid were sending Ukraine. We’ve sent 76 billion dollars so far.

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      84
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, if an unelected CEO can tell a democratically elected government what it can and can’t do we’re no better than medieval peasants who had to bow and scrape for the nobles’ favor

      • MartinXYZ@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        we’re no better than medieval peasants who had to bow and scrape for the nobles’ favor

        It’s been like that for decades(centuries?). The rich do as they please and the rest of us are treated like livestock. It’s impressive citizens don’t revolt more than they do these days.

      • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        118
        ·
        1 year ago

        Vote with your wallet. If you hate him so much don’t buy anything from him. It’s a fair meritocracy, if you think you can run a better space satellite company you are welcome to try

        • bemenaker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You know at SpaceX and Tesla, there is a layer of management between Musk and the actual production team, that does nothing but run interference. Their job is to make sure the companies stay running and moving forward, DESPITE, what Musk says.

          • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            65
            ·
            1 year ago

            That sounds like it was made up by somebody who is jealous of his intelligence and leadership skills

            • PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think it’s funny that Musk simps think peoppe are jealous when we criticize him. Honey, I wouldn’t trade places with Musk if you paid me. I already dealt with teenage insecurities, and I’d rather have average amounts of money and people who actually love me than a yawning void in my soul constantly sereking approval from adoring crowds. I want to be decent and useful to the world more than I want to be rich. And I’m not alone. You wanting to be Elon Musk doesn’t mean everyone does.

              • havokdj@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                You people need to stop feeding the trolls. If you actually think this isn’t a satirical account after reading the other shit he has posted, then you yourself are likely insane.

                Stop wasting your time, the only way to make them go away is to ignore them.

                • PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Bold of you to assume I took the time to read the other stuff he posted. And ignoring trolls doesn’t actually do much to discourage them, ime. So I’ll keep doing as I please, thanks.

    • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      145
      ·
      1 year ago

      Stop trying to tell a private citizen and businessman what he can and can’t do with his own business

        • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          106
          ·
          1 year ago

          First of all he got there by being the best businessman in the world, lots a hard work and plucky stick-to-it-ive-ness plus a keen eye for innovation. Think about this. If he hadn’t used his space satellites to stop the Ukies, Putin could have launched the Nukies! Basically he saved the planet and this is the thanks you give him. No good deed goes unpunished

      • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        When you have a contract with the federal government it comes with stipulations. Don’t “private citizen” this. It’s not a mom and pop store.

        • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But Starlink DIDN’T have a contract with the US government, DOD, or Ukraine government. That’s the point. And they went ahead and used it for guided munitions.

          Which is a violation of the terms of service and not what anyone at SpaceX had intended.

          Problem is, that’s exactly how they ended up being used!

          • Burninator05@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re tracking that Starlink sells service directly to the US military for activities that aren’t exactly tickle parties right?

            • yaaaaayPancakes@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              True, but didn’t Starshield happen after this stuff? I guess I need to relook at the timeline. But as I remember things, he started tossing starlink access at Ukraine, tried to get DoD to pay, they chose not to. Then he started to these games, and after that DoD started paying up. Starshield was announced a little bit after that.

      • sirjash@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Where do you draw the line? Should he also be allowed to sell his services to Russia? Should private companies from the US be allowed to sell arms to Russia?

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          Never mind that. Let’s suppose he can sell his services to whomever he likes.

          What about the privacy implications? How did he know that specific attack was planned? Can he just listen in on any communication going across Starlink? I don’t think anyone should be okay with that.

          • jarfil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            How did he know that specific attack was planned?

            Ukraine asked him to extend Starlink coverage for the attack.

            No conspiracy theory needed, they just told him.

          • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Since he runs Starlink, he has a map of where every single Starlink receiver is located. Literally, a real time map with GPS coordinates.

            Russia would kill to have that info.

            However, musk also hack and jam proofed Starlink to help Ukraine too.

        • kava@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The whole reason this happened is because he disabled Starlink satellites over Russia in order to help the Ukrainian war effort. He just refused to turn it on for a specific offensive operation in Crimea that Ukraine requested - claiming he wanted to avoid escalation. Him and the US government were in agreement during time. Remember the US did not want to give tanks and planes because of fear of escalation.

          I don’t mean to try and put a damper on the 5 minute hate session but I wish people would make an effort to try and understand what is happening before they make all sorts of wild conclusions and statements.

        • Wilibus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not sure where the line is but expecting a private citizen to provide vital defense infrastructure to your foreign allies and continually act in your best interests is clearly past it.

          • khannie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            The issue is removing infrastructure on your own personal whims when it goes against what your own tax payers are paying for, especially when they have funded your company / companies. It’s obscene.

            • jarfil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Except it wasn’t “removed”, he declined to “extend” it before getting paid by those tax payers.

        • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          65
          ·
          1 year ago

          Of course. That’s called capitalism and the free market. Don’t like it? Move to Venezuela

          • Vespair@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nah, I’d rather attack the cancer that is capitalism at the source and work to rid the world of its scourge once and for all. Sorry you chose the loser’s side.

              • Vespair@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Again, I’d rather stay here in the USA and make sure I spend every waking moment working to make sure we take the food out of your bowl specifically to give it to the lesser off and more deserving.

                Die mad, irrelevant dinosaur.

          • Burninator05@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            How do you figure he stopped anything? If he wanted to stop a war he should reach out to the Russian leaders he’s claiming to have talked to and get them to leave Ukraine. Instead he believes their bluffs goes back for more.

            • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              1 year ago

              He saw a nuclear war coming and he used his space satellite techno-prowess to stop it. We can only be grateful he was there to head it off, or you wouldn’t even be able to type stupid things on the internet anymore

              • dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                So, he’s the final arbiter of nuclear war? Not you know, someone in the military, not someone who actually knows anything about war. A single private citizen who just happens to have a ton of money and power. Uh huh.

                • Jarix@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Well if Castro got what he wanted, he would have launched nukes in the 60s. But russia didnt give him the codes

                • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  He has more money because he knows the most about everything. Nobody in the military is as successful as Elon

            • jarfil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Is he? Did the US Government issue an order to attack Russian assets? Even Russian assets on Ukrainian soil? Even to support any Ukrainian effort to attack Russian assets?

              So far it’s been a “we give Ukraine some stuff and intel, and let them do the fighting while keeping a semblance of plausible deniability”.

              Sounds more like a direct involvement in the attack, would’ve been undermining the US Government.

      • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly, you can’t have your cake and eat it - if we want to live in a sane and moral world we shouldn’t let private citizens own things that are important, especially not satellite infrastructure

  • krayj@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Any system capable of manipulating the outcomes of international conflict needs to become property of the government via eminent domain…especially if that system is used…especially if used by an entrepreneur operating without oversight.

    • thann@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Deactivating US military hardware in the middle of a conflict sounds a lot like an act of treason…

      • kava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        From what I understand he didn’t deactivate it… it was already deactivated and he refused to turn it on.

        He had disabled starlink systems over Russian territories - in order to help Ukraine. This included Crimea. Ukraine last year wanted to do a drone-strike on Crimea, so they asked Musk to turn them on. He refused, claiming he was scared of war escalation and that he didn’t want to be involved in offensive war operations.

        • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The way you put it is at the very least a rationale. Obviously it can be debated one way or the other, but it makes more sense than him being overtly pro-Russia. I don’t think he’s so dumb as to make it obvious.

          • kava@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah don’t trust headlines. They create the best possible headline to make as many people as interested as possible… forget about the truth or nuance. During this same period, remember that the US didn’t want to give fighter jets or tanks to Ukraine out of fear of escalation. Musk was essentially following official US military policy.

              • kava@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I agree. No one man should have all that power.

                But we’re not really talking about “what ifs” or “ideal worlds”

                This is the world we have and this is what happened.

        • thann@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A lot of the Ukrainian dishes were purchased by the US military and given to Ukraine, so they are ostensibly both

    • Jeanschyso@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Whose government though? That’s the issue with this thinking. As a person who does not live in the US, I’m not sure I want the US to own everything that can be used in war.

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean if a person does anything directly affecting a war (for any side) I’d say that person is a wartime volunteer.

    Wartime volunteers that have taken up arms are a absolutely viable target for military strikes.

    Just saying 🤷‍♂️

      • mob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        1 year ago

        Anyone considering striking US likely realizes the fallout from that strategy though

        • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          During the cold war, there were plenty of instances of fighting between us and soviet forces, not to mention the huge amount of proxy fighting done. Personally, I’m not interested in drawing up a sequel to the cold war.

            • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Why though? There’s been plenty of hot and cold wars, plenty of proxy wars.

              This isn’t special in that regard, except now using the propaganda talking points of view a fascist enemy is done without a hint of shame from the stooges who do it.

            • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              1 year ago

              As I see it, we’re at a turning point. Either we continue a path of escalation, or we back down, either would be feasible given our current position, but that said current position isn’t somewhere we can stay. We either need to accept that sacrificing some global influence is necessary to avoid foreign wars, or that maintaining our current global influence inevitably requires putting soldiers behind our words.

              • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                19
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                This is a weird take… The war in Ukraine is largely being fought because Russia isn’t going to stop with Ukraine. We’re protecting our allies in Europe, and looking to prevent further escalation, not simply exerting influence on a far-away foreign war.

                The escalating party is 100% the aggressing party that’s invading a sovereign nation. That’s Russia, not the United States.

                I mean, unless you’re speaking as a Russian citizen? Perhaps I’m misunderstanding your point of view here.

                • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  This is the exact attitude I was trying to call out. We are absolutely escalating our participation in this conflict. Trying to strattle the line of participation, where nothing we do is our own fault, and neither are any of the consequences we face. Because I’m not sure how well you did in middle school geography, but the US is, in fact, not a part of Europe. This war has no direct impact on the US beyond the extent we choose to be involved.

                  Now if you view the benefits of involvement as greater than the risks, fine. That’s a perfectly coherent position. One I don’t agree with, but a rational position nonetheless. But to pretend our involvement is just a force of nature we have no control over? That’s just a bunch of excuses to support involvement without having to openly commit to a position of involvement.

        • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh yeah, I don’t mean to say otherwise. It was more a rhetorical question to point out the nature of how these things always end up escalating.

          • Anduin1357@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Starlink is not providing an essential service to Ukraine. They do not have the right to expect SpaceX to cooperate with their military effort when SpaceX is a US company under dual-use rules to not unilaterally provide military connectivity to weapons systems to foreign nations.

            Ukraine must do military procurement properly and go through the US government to get approval, not whatever this is. They used a civilian service for military purposes, so they are in breach of the terms of use of Starlink and should not be surprised when services degrades at SpaceX’s whims.

            The law priorities the health of people, but Starlink isn’t meant for use like this, so this analogy is moot.

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Make sure to save this for the next time that shitbird or one of his moron suckups tries to say he helped Ukraine. Fucker oughtta be treated the same as any Russian collaborator.

    • nik0@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, save this when he eventually sneaks in a putin missile somehow.

  • muzzle@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    But the truly galaxy brain move is in this article:

    After CNN’s reporting, Musk reversed course, tweeting “the hell with it … we’ll just keep funding Ukraine govt for free.”

    Gwynne Shotwell, Musk’s president at SpaceX, was livid at Musk’s reversal, according to Isaacson.

    “The Pentagon had a $145 million check ready to hand to me, literally,” Isaacson quotes Shotwell as saying. “Then Elon succumbed to the bullshit on Twitter and to the haters at the Pentagon who leaked the story.”

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah we keep finding out more and more ways this mofo sucks. Somebody needs to strap him to the front of his stupid rocket and launch him into orbit.

  • Grant_M@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Muskovite belongs in prison with the other russian war criminals.

  • nik0@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Starlink was not meant to be involved in wars. It was so people can watch Netflix and chill and get online for school and do good peaceful things, not drone strikes.”

    Yes my satellite that is actively being used in a war should be designed only for Netflix and chill.