• 5oap10116@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      And that’s just average. Chances are teachers are making anywhere between 40-100K in GA with the majority probably below 64

    • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I remember when teachers were complaining about making 24k a year in the last decade. (I’m just saying, not being contrarian)

      • eran_morad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        53 minutes ago

        Bro. I saw the light and left academia shortly after my phd. I make a very good living doing other shit, mainly managing money and people. I do better than most tenured profs. So can you.

          • eran_morad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            31 minutes ago
            1. Get phd.
            2. realize it’s a fucking scam.
            3. look for jobs.
            4. find one, realize it’s a viable career path.
            5. be strategic about pivoting until you’re handling accounting and investments.
            6. learn shit.
            7. get fat pockets.
    • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      $64k is a great salary in my area of PA. I’m not familiar with GA but I imagine it’s the same. To put this into comparison, the average household income in GA is $75k and most households are two earners, so yeah, seems pretty good.

      • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Now do it with average households with college degrees, since that’s a more reasonable comparison.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Just because something is average doesn’t mean it’s good.

        If the average grade of a class is fifty… that doesn’t mean it’s a good grade. It just means a majority of the class is failing.

          • Zorque@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Which part? Can you explain your reasoning in a way that’s not just “nuh-uh”?

            As I understand it, an average is when you add together several quantities and then divide that total by the number of quantities. How does this in any way affect actual living wage (or grades, in my given example)?

            • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Just knowing that the average is 50 does not in any way tell you the grades of the majority of the class. Most of the kids could be passing while a few abysmal performers bring the average down.

              • Zorque@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                That’s what you take issue with? That the analogy isn’t completely perfect? Do you get the general idea of what I’m saying, or does that slight inconsistency complete negate the entire argument?

                The point is that an average isn’t indicative of overall health… it’s just a value representing the average income. It makes no bearing on actual economic health without comparing it to other factors.

                • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  No, it wasn’t about perfection. It was about you being wrong.

                  It’s ok to just reflect and try to do better next time instead of dig in and defend a mistake. It’s how we grow.

      • bizarroland@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I mean it’s definitely nice but after pensions and taxes and everything else it’s probably like an extra $400 a month. Not exactly world shattering but definitely nice.

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          There are a shit ton of people in this country living on so little that an extra $400 per month would be huge for them.

          There’s a percentage of those who would consider an extra $400 per month life changing money. If you were making minimum wage this would be the equivalent of working an extra 25 hours per week. Math is pre-tax.

        • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          8 hours ago

          President Biden deserves way more credit for getting what he’s done this term despite the GOP’s best efforts to hamstring it in every possible way.

          • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Biden in the US and Trudeau in Canada both deserve a lot more credit than they get, but the mood in western nations is pretty sour.