Hopefully, the solution is new boats that are a more sensible size, and don’t need the extensive infrastructure upgrades the new fleet would have required. One of the cancelled designs would have been a similar displacement to our current fleet of three.

I really hope the solution isn’t another clapped out beater from Europe.

  • DaveMA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    If we’re going to the effort of infrastructure, what’s the reason for staying with Picton instead of somewhere near Blenheim? As I understand it, avoiding the restrictions of the Malborough Sounds could shave a significant amount of time off the trip.

    • IlovethebombOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      If our government managed to blow out the projected cost of upgrading our existing infrastructure by more than the cost of the boats themselves, can you imagine what they’d do if they tried to build a whole new port somewhere?

      Although I do like the idea of moving to somewhere like Port Underwood.

      • DaveMA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yeah, my assunmption was that if you’re going to build a new docking platform and building to support the giant new boats, you are probaby most of the way to to cost of setting up fresh in a closer place. And you are already significantly increasing the capacity of the crossings if you cut an hour off the trip.

        It seems like the reason for the much larger boats were favoured is because they can take trains. It would be interesting to know if this is actually a financially superiour solution compared to, say, coastal shipping.

        • IlovethebombOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          We’ve had far smaller vessels in the past that have been rail enabled though, even smaller than what we currently have.

          An argument against moving is we wouldn’t just have to build the port, we would need road, rail, and all the utilities as well, whereas in Picton they’re already there.

          • DaveMA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Yeah, I’d be curious if a private company could build themselves a smallish port and start running a premium service where they could charge more because of the shorter travel time. You wouldn’t have the supporting township but that could grow overtime as you pick up more customers.

            • IlovethebombOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              That’s been done in a way with a catamaran service, the Fast Cat ferries were brought in to compete with them. I think they sailed from Porirua.

              Part of the problem is you would have to base yourself in Port Underwood, which is kinda the middle of nowhere, which would erase some of the time savings.