So as we all know on the news, the cybersecurity firm Crowdstrike Y2K’d it’s own end customers with a shoddy non-tested update.

But how does this happen? Aren’t there programming teams and check their code or pass it to a quality assurance staff to see if it bricked their own machines?

8.5 Million machines too, does that effect home users too or is it only for windows machines that have this endpoint agent installed?

Lastly, why would large firms and government institutions such as railway networks and hospitals put all their eggs in one basket? Surely chucking everything into “The Cloud (Literally just another man’s tinbox)” would be disastrous?

TLDR - Confused how this titanic tits up could happen and that 8.5 Million windows machines (POS, Desktops and servers) just packed up.

  • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fantastic write up. I’d just add something to this bit:

    Basically companies wouldn’t use CS unless they are too lazy to change away, or they think it’s really that good.

    I work in Cyber Security for a large organization (30,000+ end points). We’re considering moving to CrowdStrike. Even after this cock-up, we’re still considering moving to CS. I’ve had direct experience with several different A/V and EDR products, and every single one of them has had a bad update cause systems to BSOD. The reason this one hit so hard is that CS is one of the major EDR/XDR vendors. But ya, it’s generally considered that good. Maybe some folks will move away after this. And maybe another product is nipping at their heels and will overtake them in the near future. But, for now, it’s not surprising that it was everywhere for this situation to get really FUBAR.

    • sunzu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If people don’t start using alternatives, the Centralization remains as a vulnerability and this will happen again then.

      • Sadbutdru@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Perhaps instead of clients using two different security systems, Crowd strike and similar companies could have two or more completely independent teams sending out separate versions of their hourly updates. That way when something like this happens it would likely not bring down all of a client’s systems, and help resilience? It could be made into a requirement for providing security software to critical/strategic industries like healthcare, power transmission/distribution, defense, etc.