Two Ministry of Justice workers are in hot water for describing a researcher as a “bitch” in an online conversation.

Academic and author Barbara Sumner made a number of Official Information Act requests as part of her PhD research into the systems around adoption. Then, in October last year, she asked for all correspondence mentioning her by name.

“Because I had felt all along that there was a resistance to everything I sent in and you know, just the sort of snottiness, I guess, of some of the responses that came in that request. I wanted to understand how they were treating me throughout the process.”

One page of the response stood out among more than 100 others. A November 2022 Teams conversation between two staffers, whose names were redacted, complained about Sumner’s latest request.

They described it as “a waste of time” and said it “should have been refused on the ground of substantial collation” or that the ministry should “charge her for it and get a contractor”.

“our ministerial services team sucks cuz they wouldnt let us refuse, and helen didnt push back hard [sic],” one worker wrote.

"but also shes a bitch for wanting everything. does she think govt just has unlimited resources for this type of crap lol.

“like theres no public interest in our emails back and forward.”

  • Venator
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The fact she put in an OIA request for all correspondence mentioning her by name kinda shows that she’s probably doing a lot of unnecessary requests, but it also shows that her suspicions were kinda correct.

    Maybe she had to put in a lot of extra requests due to people filling the requests not supplying all the relevant info the first time, or denying her requests more frequently once people started to recognise her name… 🤔

    That said, reaction of info can be extremely tedious(speaking from what I’ve heard from friends who have to redact videos of software testing), and will drive almost anyone a bit up the wall… 😅