A foundational 1984 decision had required courts to defer to agencies’ reasonable interpretations of ambiguous statutes, underpinning regulations on health care, safety and the environment.
This is what the decision by the Republican justices to allow “gratuities” for public officials creates an incentive for.
Theoretically could congress pass laws stating that the EPA has the right to regulate all chemicals if they do choose? I’m sure it would also have ramifications I suppose
Theoretically could congress pass laws stating that the EPA has the right to regulate all chemicals if they do choose? I’m sure it would also have ramifications I suppose