• UnicodeHamSic [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cybernetics. The needs of people are essentially known and predictable. We can just make them and give them to people. That is also kinda how most of human history worked and it was fine then. It could be fine now, even better with computer data analysis and rational processing.

    Sure there will be exceptions like little Japanese computer parts. However some democratic process could be used. Plenty of writers and scifi stories have possible systems. We can figure that out when we get there.

    • Alterecho@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m actually not not into the idea of being able to instantly and accurately judge the needs of a whole nation of people. I mean shit, we already collect so much data through smart watches that once we are able to accurately measure metabolic rate, that’s like 90% of it right there I think lol

      • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is a book, the people’s republic of Walmart.

        Basically every company with sufficient money does exactly this and they are very effective at it. Just what if instead of using the tech to make Walmart slightly more money we used it to make some public goods cheap and effective

        • Alterecho@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah Yes, another fine addition to my reading list.

          seriously though, we live in a late-stage capitalist hellscape and it’s always funny to be when people use government monitoring fears to justify removing core social safety nets while simultaneously Walmart, Google, etc. Know when your balls ache because they have collected data on you from when you were prepubescent.