• Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 days ago

        I’d agree it should be. However, there is no government grant for journalism, and journalists have to eat. Either it’s free, and the journalists either don’t do the work or make it a hobby project (which means less quality) or they have to get paid somehow.

        • morphballganon@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          17 days ago

          The people writing articles and the people plastering ads in between every paragraph are not the same.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                17 days ago

                Sure man, I’ll quote it for you even: “You presumed that because a claim has been poorly argued, or a fallacy has been made, that the claim itself must be wrong.”

                I was not saying what you said must be wrong because you committed a fallacy. I was saying your argument was a fallacy and held no relevance.

                Is claiming you’re right by saying someone committed the fallacy fallacy the fallacy fallacy fallacy?

          • stoicmaverick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 days ago

            You’re missing the point. Where do you think the money that the journalist need to pay for food should come from? Were you just about to sign up for a paid subscription?