The intruder was charged with a low-level offence and he was convicted and discharged. But, that wasn't the end of it.

The 41-year-old man was initially charged with unlawfully being in a building and on 1 March, he appeared in the Nelson District Court before a community magistrate who convicted and discharged him.

Uhh, what the fuck? How did anyone think letting this person go was a reasonable thing to do?

  • DaveMA
    2·
    3 days ago

    Yeah, possibly. But also they may have collected more evidence in the meantime.

    I’d also bet a fair bit of money that the police don’t have the resources they need to fully investigate. It sounds like the police might have got more evidence later, too. This part:

    The next day, in the early hours of 2 March, the man allegedly destroyed hundreds of plants at a commercial nursery near Motueka, after entering the property on his motorbike and allegedly destroyed the CCTV camera when he noticed it, the police summary of facts says.

    On advice from friends, colleagues and contacts within law enforcement outside the region, Reese went back to the police.

    What was she bringing to the police? Is she linked to the nursery or is this sentence a separate statement saying she talked with the police some more about the initial break in?

    • IlovethebombOP
      2·
      3 days ago

      It reads to me that she went back to the police, and spoke further with them about that night, which led to the more serious charges being placed.

      • DaveMA
        2·
        3 days ago

        If that’s the case, it sounds like the only possible mistake here is that the police didn’t spend enough time with her the first time. Like I said, I’d bet the police don’t have the funding they need. Hiring freeze leading to 200 empty roles, plus an additional 175 redundancies to meet the governments cost cutting directive is probably not helping things.