Absolutely great read from Bernard Hickey on Hipkins’ wealth tax announcement and the treasury report released yesterday:

That’s it. It will now be almost impossible for a wealth or capital gains tax to be implemented within the next decade or two.

The future of Aotearoa’s political economy will now remain frozen in its stagnant, unequal, unjust, unproductive and unhealthy state for the forseeable future. That’s what our leaders, and ultimately the only voters that matter, have decided. Those hoping to change that frozen landscape should now look after themselves and their families, and/or hope and work for an electoral miracle that gives parties who want such taxes dominant positions in any post-election negotiation.

  • Xcf456
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s true to a point. The solution is to make it kick in at amounts above what most people will pass on and as a result you prevent dynasties forming that damage society and over time, amass so much wealth that eventually mean others can’t build up anything to pass on to their children.

    Being against inheritance taxes outright is actually worse for the outcomes you want.

    • Ilovethebomb
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The solution is to make it kick in at amounts above what most people will pass on

      I’m also not a fan of this type of thinking either. If it’s wrong to do, it’s wrong to do it to anyone. The whole “it’s only x% of the population” argument just makes me uneasy.

      • Xcf456
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s literally how our tax rates work

        • Ilovethebomb
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          What percentage of the population pays some form of income tax, would you say? I’m not sure how you think the two are comparable.

          • Xcf456
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’re comparable because they’re both applied progressively. Income tax rates scale at higher income points. Wealth tax, inheritance tax, whatever it is. If they’re set to kick in at a certain threshold everyone pays the same amount up to that point - zero.

            • Ilovethebomb
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If only 0.whatever% of the population paid income tax, you’d have a point.