• DaveMA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Do you know the criteria? I don’t know much about architecture, is it about houses that are technically impressive or that look the best?

    Also asking @[email protected]

    • happy_piwakawakaOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      From the NZIA About the awards programme (which took me a bit to find):

      The awards judges assess each project in terms of the following:

      The relationship of the building to its site, context and presence

      The degree of consistency and completeness in expressing the relationship between concept, form and structure

      Light, colour, texture and spatial qualities

      Structure, construction, materials and issues of durability and detail

      Environmental performance

      User satisfaction, value to the client and acceptability of solutions to the brief

      Contribution to the advancement of architecture as a discipline and the enhancement of the human spirit

      It seems like there’s a panel of jurors that visit the sites as well as meeting with the architects and clients

      • DaveMA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Thanks! I’m not sure I quite understand architecture enough, but many of the entries seem boring to me 😆. Though it can be hard to judge from one photo.

        • liv
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t know that much about it but it’s an interesting discipline because it’s about usefulness and art all at once.

          I’m guessing sometimes if it gets too exciting it either loses functionality or the clients hate it/won’t build it. But yeah I think you’d have to walk around in them to judge them.

          • DaveMA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, I just look at these photos and think sure, that’s a nice looking BNZ building. But is it nicer than the one right next to it in the photo, or is it just a standard office building? Some of the houses just look like a house (without eaves, popular during the leaky home period 😆), some are large developments that just look like any other.

            Sorry, I think this stuff is lost on me. Maybe when the winner is announced there will be a nice description of everything and then I’ll understand better why it’s well architected.