This story keeps on giving. He lives in Auckland, Parliament was not in session, but hosted a party for his extended family at this unlivable place, and then it turns out he’s actually stayed there at least a couple of nights.

I wonder who paid for the private Christmas do at the place he doesn’t live. Did he have it in the apartment or in the public reception areas. Some other articles suggest he’s also stayed there other times as well.

So, very unlivable then. I wonder, was he even staying in the apartment he was claiming the $52k benefit on?

    • TagMeInSkipIGotThisOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      Look he’s just entitled to the entitlements man, what could he do - its his entitlement, he’s entitled to it.