• Semi-Hemi-Demigod
    link
    fedilink
    -558 months ago

    Churchill was a racist idiot and that’s still a dumb quote.

    Democracy is a plane with 20 people on it. Nine vote not to crash it and eleven vote to fly it into a mountain, and that means everyone dies because democracy

    • Bipta
      link
      fedilink
      46
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      So instead you choose authoritarianism: 20 people on a plan and one of them shoots the pilot, takes over, and crashes it. Everyone dies.

      • PugJesus
        link
        fedilink
        288 months ago

        Yeah, the problems with democracy are rarely solved by less democracy. It just turns into “Instead of many idiots voting to do something stupid, one idiot votes to do something stupid.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -38 months ago

        Think bigger. Fly the plane in circles, and demand the people give you whatever you want to occasionally land it and bring some supplies onboard.

        Just don’t die of old age.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
        link
        fedilink
        -208 months ago

        Love how you think that not only are there only two options, but that democracy isn’t also authoritarian. It’s just mob rule instead of an individual.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          That’s… precisely why the original quote said “democracy is the worst form of government”. It has fundamental flaws. But it’s still the better than everything else.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      338 months ago

      Churchill’s point is that stupid things can still happen in democracies, but no one has come up with a better alternative. What would you suggest as the better alternative? If you don’t have one, then you just helped prove Churchill’s point!

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
        link
        fedilink
        -308 months ago

        Every human knows and has used a superior system from the time they first started playing with other people: Consensus.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          268 months ago

          …which is basically what democracy is, but systemitized such that it can be applied at scale.

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
            link
            fedilink
            -28 months ago

            Your shoe has a pretty good knowledge of anarchism. You could learn a thing or two from it

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
            link
            fedilink
            -158 months ago

            Democracy is majority rule, and fuck whatever the minority wants.

            Consensus is we don’t do anything unless we all agree.

              • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
                link
                fedilink
                -48 months ago

                So the only way to get anything done is to do it against the will of at least some people? You’ve never been in a group where you agreed on a course of action together?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  6
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  In a group… you mean a very limited setting where you can discuss directly with everyone and get direct feedback in real time from everyone?

                  How do you suggest that this might work on a large scale, with millions of people?

                  Edit: And if for example 10 million people somehow found consensus and then one guy is like “lmao no”, everything gets canned?

                  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
                    link
                    fedilink
                    08 months ago

                    There’s lots of ideas about this, but my solution is to simply eliminate the idea that we need to rule millions of people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It’s more like,

      • 2 hijackers vote to crash
      • 1 votes with the hijackers because they share a hometown
      • 2 vote no
      • another 2 vote strong no
      • the other 12 don’t participate because they don’t want to get too political (we have 40% voter turnout where I live)

      and I’ve been through enough elections to see how we are all heading to a crash, every time.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      98 months ago

      But if we made you running everything it would be perfect.

      That’s the thing with anti-democracy sentiment the people who advocate for it always assume they, or someone who agrees with them on everything, is going to run things. No one imagines themselves in a slave society being a slave.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      68 months ago

      No, nine vote to crash it, seven vote to go left and four vote to go right.

      Crashing it is! Thanks, first past the post voting system.