• Kbin_space_program
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Badly written. 80% are industrial. They are, based on their public numbers, responsible for a third of the world’s CO2 though.

    Their official numbers put them at number 1 CO2 emitter, and pollute more then next 5.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      Well it just seems odd to fold together industrial and Chinese emissions. Nationally and by sector are two totally different ways of dividing up emissions.

      Anyway China is a major source of emissions and deserves criticism for that but it doesn’t seem very relevant overall.

      • Kbin_space_program
        link
        fedilink
        59 months ago

        That was partially true more than a decade ago, since they could have had laws in place to prevent those emissions.

        Now though they’re more making things for themselves, and any attempt on their part to declare themselves a “developing country” is a sham.

          • Kbin_space_program
            link
            fedilink
            29 months ago

            Because the ecosystem doesn’t care about pollution per capita.

            Also, the reason the US is so high is because it refines most of the world’s oil.

            Same reason Canada is so high. Alberta, by itself, is more than half of Canada CO2 emissions.

            • @Kbin_space_program @throws_lemy @LibertyLizard Sure, the ecosystem doesn’t care about per capita, but the largest reductions in emissions would understandably come from the largest per-capita emitters.

              Nothing I’m saying here is specific to China. We should be tracing back and allocating *all* emissions based on the ‘instigator’ of those emissions. It’s sort of like blaming Togo or Benin for poor child slavery records while ignoring that most of the demand for that labor comes from *us*.