I wonder when NZ will move away from the quasi-free-market-but-funded-by-the-government system in health (and education). It leads to outcomes like this which are clearly inefficient. I’d like to see more centralisation.
I wonder when NZ will move away from the quasi-free-market-but-funded-by-the-government system in health (and education). It leads to outcomes like this which are clearly inefficient. I’d like to see more centralisation.
In my imagined version, you adjust tax brackets so people keep approx the same take home pay, and people on benefits/super receive approx the same amount.
Unfortunately with a major overhaul of policy where you give out free money but no one is better off, well you can’t really sell it politically, so I can’t see it ever happening. But that would be my ideal implementation for a starting point.
Thanks for the explanation, that kind of makes more sense than just giving everyone the same amount.
So I’d pick a baseline, probably the NZ super single person payment, then make this the amount for everyone.
Then adjust the lower tax bracket so everyone working and earning over that threshold ($14k) would pay slightly more in tax, about the same as the new payment.
Then get rid of all benefits and superannuation (but keep the other assistance payments like accommodation supplement, disability allowance, etc).
This does leave some people slightly better off, but it shouldn’t cause more inflation than any other election bribe.
It then gives you a starting point to e.g. raise the UBI towards the living wage equivalent, make some supplementary payments standard and give them to everyone, etc.
Details would need to be worked through by a policy team, but at a high level I think this would be a big benefit to the country.
Makes sense. NZ super single is about twice core benefit. That would pretty much lift everyone out of poverty super fast.
Our gini coefficient would shrink and our entire society would get the bonuses to health and economy that go along with that.
Right, I want to vote for you at the next election.
Haha it may make sense but it’s not a vote winner. Your average voter will think spending hundreds of millions on WINZ reform just to make it more complex (now we need a bank account from everyone in the country so they can be paid from two sources) is not a good idea, and the right will for sure be telling people no one will work and the economy will collapse even though trials overseas have not had this effect.
True, true. I think we spend millions on pointless cosmetic winz remodels pretty much every time we get a new govt, but people never notice.