Last weeks thread here

Welcome to this week’s casual kōrero thread!

This post will be pinned in this community so you can always find it, and will stay for about a week until replaced by the next one.

It’s for talking about anything that might not justify a full post. For example:

  • Something interesting that happened to you
  • Something humourous that happened to you
  • Something frustrating that happened to you
  • A quick question
  • A request for recommendations
  • Pictures of your pet
  • A picture of a cloud that kind of looks like an elephant
  • Anything else, there are no rules (except the rule)

So how’s it going?

  • TagMeInSkipIGotThis
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It begins! Here’s a mug of kool-aid ;) So, who’s taking odds on TTC and TTA*?

    There’s a legitimate criticisms to be made of Ubiquiti’s products, but they perform very well, are relatively simple to setup and maintain and most importantly for me, you get a perpetual license in the up front purchase price - no annual ransomware like other similar providers. Plus you can host the controller yourself, you don’t have to be tied to their cloud offering (if they even still bother with it).

    I haven’t setup their built-in ad blocking yet as the local DNS was a bit of a pain so I still use pi-hole for all my own home stuff’s DNS anyway, and I have wireguard running off their box as I set that up when their implementation was very new and not quite what I was after. But only a matter of time before I switch to the same setup as yours.

    *(time till cameras, time till access-points)!

    • TagMeInSkipIGotThis
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Actually on cameras, I think Ubiquiti are adding Onvif support to Protect which should let you add non-Ubiquiti cameras to their setup too. Of course then you won’t get the special detection features so i’ll continue to use frigate & offload the “is human?” analysis to a GPU.

      • DaveOPMA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’ve been looking at Reolink with built in detection. Would I still need frigate?

        I’d want it integrated with Home Assistant anyway, so might not even need Unifi Protect in the stack.

        • TagMeInSkipIGotThis
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I really like the frigate project, and the detection models it has are really really good, and that meant I could use really cheap Amcrest (I think) cameras because the brains was on the server end rather than camera end. Plus I kinda prefer the device side to be as dumb as possible as they can often have all sorts of vulnerabilities baked in the more IoT they are.

          Though I also really hate Home Assistant so I use Frigate as a standalone app, and I manage notifications in a somewhat roundabout way (mqtt -> loki -> grafana -> pushover). I did that because I got heartily sick of how awful Home Assistant was at determining whether I was, or was not at home.

          So now I use Unpoller to get my device states from the UDM, that gets stored in prometheus, and my Grafana alert rule works out if my partner or I are at home based on our device being connected to the WiFi or not; then each MQTT event for a detection it only sends a notification if both phones are away.

          • DaveOPMA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 minutes ago

            Haha I fought with Home Assistant on the home/not home thing too. It’s really food now, though. I think the issue is HA uses the google significant motion update, so it doesn’t get realtime location data but instead updates on some black box google schedule. They have a high accuracy mode but it still doesn’t seem to poll regularly. It’s unclear to me exactly what changes.

            On my phone I also use PhoneTrack synced to Nextcloud for location tracking, and that updates every minute. I think this seems to allow HA to get more frequent updates, as it works great for me now. Still a massive problem on my wife’s phone, who has no need for PhoneTrack. Detecting WiFi network is my next plan for her, which you can do in HA as well.

    • DaveOPMA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      What trouble did you have with local DNS? I haven’t had any issues.

      What I like about Pi-hole is the control. With the block ads setting here, it’s a checkbox on or off. Pi-hole lets me add custom block lists, and see a log of what’s being blocked to help me resolve issues with sites not working.

      Annoyingly I have Amplify APs which while made by Ubiquiti they aren’t compatible with the Unifi range in terms of controller. They work fine but I have to manage them separately.

      • TagMeInSkipIGotThis
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Its only recent releases of Unifi Network that have made it easy to setup local DNS entries - it used to be very kludgy or not possible back when I first deployed PiHole as DNS for me.