No you fucking weren’t. You were just spamming about free speech because you just wanted to regurgitate whatever talking points you read and didn’t care to notice that I never once said otherwise.
Have a good one hombre, I don’t think it’s worth continuing any “conversation” here.
Glad you finally realized you have nothing remotely worth saying. Good riddance.
This is a free speech issue, the free market dictates they can do as they please.
I never said otherwise you fucking retarded imbecile. Get with the fucking conversation or stop spamming your moronic shit.
Jesus you’re fucking dense. Yes, there’s an encyclopedia of laws to be passed. No, it doesn’t justify forcing them all into one big yes/no
I could make an entire encyclopedia of law just under one incredibly generic principle like you’re doing. It doesn’t make it into a specific policy just because it shares a theme.
Ahh, I didn’t realize you were just pro-corporate censorship via advertiser interest. Should’ve lead with that. See, not all of us agree that advertisements having such a major sway in what we all see is a good thing.
It’s entirely severable. The article clearly listed multiple distinct topics. Measures could easily be made for each separate one.
So you agree it’s broad then? Cool. They should either pass individual ballot measures or fuck off. Just crying “rights” isn’t an excuse to sidestep good legislatige process
You, if you’ve already forgotten, called musk a “manchild” for not just doing what advertisers wanted. When you were asked why the advertisers are not also “manchildren” for crying about what’s on Twitter, you just tried to change the topic to free markets. Nobody, anywhere, was saying that the advertisers were not allowed to pull out. You were asked a question of value about their choice to pull out.
You seriously fail to understand how “everything related to those topics” is not a single issue bill?
The fucking article told you that.
Lmao I wonder how all the people talking about how politicians need to be younger and more knowledgeable about what they’re legislating about will feel about him
I have. Multiple fucking times
Seems I was right about you
Thisbis hardly news, no? Didn’t Disney admit years ago that they were actively prioritizing DEI in that leaked call from upper management? Or am I thinking of something else they did
Denser than a fucking brick, you are
All 3 of these comments I’m quoting were in response to comments making honest argument
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I know you can manage to disagree with people without calling them names, even if they’re annoying
I can, but at some point, people who repeatedly refuse to extend honest discussion back no longer deserve the effort on my part.
“almost a sixth”. Lmao
So then vote on each specific law individually and stop throwing a fit if its all stuff you’re confident in. Simple as.