set up != write software
From the little I played with Arduino’s IoT platform, I honestly believe that if there is a compatible sensor that can detect vape smoke, almost anyone could get a simple version up and running. It was a very simple and largely automated setup if all you want is to get the sensor output to the portal and then link it to a UI element.
Of course gluing together this software is more complex than that, but it’s no grand feat either.
Absolutely I am making a bunch of assumptions. Following the tried and true Keep It Simple Stupid approach. Because there is no indication given that any more complexity is required, and keeping complexity to a minimum is key to efficient development. If there was anything actually technically impressive (or at least technically impressive sounding) about what they did, I trust they would have mentioned it.
I do not claim to be amazing, and it’s a simple fact that many basic examples/tutorials are named with hello world (and pretty easy to search for that way). A quick Google pulls up e.g. “Hello World!” of push notifications, Problems with simple “hello world” of ListView in Android
And of course I’m also explicitly using Hello World to reference the original comment
In all likelihood calling manufacturer’s API to read the value then compare to a compile-time constant? It’s a notification hello-world merged with display-a-list hello world and manufacturer’s reading-sensor-values hello world. Yes I do think it’s borderline trivial
Then why publish detection events like this? If they do start following up, all it does is warn perpetrators, and allow for fast iteration of anti-detection, to say nothing of other concerns people have mentioned (tripping other people’s detectors etc.)
Unless there will be disciplinary follow-up ( -> no reason for this design), I only see this going the way of de-facto scoreboards among kids.
Discord has a getting started with mod development, beyond that you will have to learn to code as of course any necessary item interactions would have to be coded in. Beyond that, it should mostly be a matter of starting with one, then carefully transplanting code from the other for the features you want
Making it another dedicated equip slot basically
Champions and Bosses are a great start, Diet is an easy addition (it does force you to explore more efficiently) and Swarm too, beyond that it depends on your preferred playstyle. As a grass-abuse huntress player, Barren is still off and Darkness was the last I added, but this can change greatly if you use a different approach
The answer is simply to add challenges gradually. As you get used to more and more challenges low chal runs get easier and easier
In all fairness I haven’t done a RoW run with FiMA, but I have done a fair bit of farming with FiMA and other chals, I see no reason I couldn’t do much the same thing with RoW
Yeah, but not in this case. Blooming bow, upgraded assasin’s blade, noisemaker pulling in scorpios and evil eyes -> lots of seeds and potions
Nice, though I would miss the pillar in the case shown
Looks like you need more practice then. I also got the badge by slapping every SoU on the staff, but mine was a win
I stuck with magic missile, using mainly corrosion as a secondary to take advantage of the boost, and the on-hit recharge to keep it usable
The option to input a seed is unlocked when you first win; on the character select screen you press the cogwheel and select the seed option
Optional auto aiming button for touch input that works like tab with keyboard input
Guessing this jumps to target another enemy? You can just tap the enemy indicator to do that, even without bringing up the auto aim
In terms of fancy aiming especially beyond what auto-target will do for you, to me that very much seems like part of player skill, that said a more visible grid especially in black regions (i.e. areas around rooms and corridors) would help a lot
Sounds somewhat like a more tame (effects wise) version of the trinkets system Evan is working on atm
Other than that, I feel like it’s unnecessary complexity
Going by the phrasing I’d say educated guess. I for one agree, it sounds like a massive liability when you have e.g. data protection laws to think about