I’ve seen the farming one already! The way Ru ends up kinda confuses me, but I tend not to pay too much mind to plot holes in “okay” shows anyway. Overall I think it’s just a nice comfy one.

As for Isekai Ojisan, I haven’t heard of it but it sounds exactly like the kind of thing I’m looking for, so I’ll give it a shot!

Preferably anime, but if you have good suggestions that fit the other categories then go for it!

Magenta. It’s fake. Not real. A phoney.

It’s a combination of two colors masquerading as a real colour. If we ignore the fact that pretty much all screens display combinations of only 3 colors, magenta is the only “color” that does not appear on the visual spectrum. This is because it is actually an illusion in our minds produced by wavelengths on both ends of the visible spectrum.

It’s a fraud and I won’t have it.

The player could describe what they saw, but nobody except the GM knows if it’s true.

It’s equally plausible that the paladin failed the check and saw a monster when there was only a dog, or that they passed the check and saw a monster because there was in fact a monster. Their argument to the party would be the same in either case: “that’s no dog, it’s a space station monster”.

The party then must question who saw the correct thing. Did the paladin actually see something everyone else missed? Or are they just seeing things? My point was that the players should not immediately be able to discern the truth. I find that this kind of uncertainty breeds intrigue!

I’ve never actually played, so this might be standard practice anyway, but I think this would be a great time to have the DM roll privately for each player and not tell them if they passed or failed. If the players only know what their character saw (and not if they pass or fail the check, or even get an idea based on the roll) then metagaming is impossible. This could produce a situation where it’s just a dog but the paladin thinks they saw a monster because they failed the roll, or it could be the other way around.
Doing it with DM-only rolls ensures the players have to actually figure out what they saw rather than knowing based on what they rolled or if they passed.

As I said, this could be standard practice, I have no idea. But I hope it is.

I spent 2 months looking for a music video I swear I’d watched. YouTube’s watch history did not help at all, not to mention it would sometimes break while scrolling so I couldn’t get that far.

I finally found it by exporting my Google Takeout data, selecting only YouTube data, and then loading the watch history file in a text editor and searching for things like “music video” and “official video”. I found it in about 2 minutes.

Giving “Feddit” a whole new meaning

By 3D do you mean real? Or would you include 3D animation in that definition?

The hardest choices require the strongest wills…

I meant that the size doesn’t matter to me as long as the shape is good. They can be nonexistent or they can be massive, as long as they have a nice shape then I like them.

Sorry if my wording was confusing!

I’d absolutely have to find them attractive. I know people can look past physical attributes if their partner’s personality is great, and that’s fine, I just don’t feel like I can do that. To me, romance (and sex, of course) is a pretty big part of a relationship, and if I can’t look at her and go “wow she’s cute” (or something along those lines), then it just isn’t going to work for me.

She should also need to have her own identity. Not gender identity, fuck that, I mean she’s her own person with her own goals and opinions etc. Someone who I can actually talk to and joke around and hang out with, someone who fits in with my friend group, not just with me.

And if I had to be shallow and pick a physical attribute or two: slim body, and breast shape >>>>> breast size. They can be the size of space hoppers or look like two skittles on an ironing board, as long as the shape is good then I’m happy!

I don’t like lettuce on my burgers. Every time I’ve had it it’s just soggy and wet and it’s been ruined for me.