France says Russia can be represented but president will not be invited because of war in Ukraine

Russia will be invited to send representatives to an international ceremony commemorating the 80th anniversary of D-day – but not Vladimir Putin, the French organisers have announced.

The Élysée is reported to have accepted that the country should be represented but said its leader is not welcome because of Moscow’s ongoing war on Ukraine.

“In view of the circumstances, President Putin will not be invited to take part in the commemorations of the Normandy landings,” the Liberation Mission organising committee said.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      7 months ago

      In theory, that’s up to the French state.

      In practice, Putin wouldn’t go to a state that wouldn’t agree to extend diplomatic immunity to him.

      And France isn’t going to grant diplomatic immunity and violate it.

      So there isn’t really a scenario where he’s going to go and then France is going to arrest him. Either France doesn’t grant diplomatic immunity and he doesn’t enter France, or France does grant diplomatic immunity and he passes through without issue.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        How much of a shitshow would it cause if France granted diplomatic immunity, and then the US carried out a special drone delivery operation?

        • avater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          How much of a shitshow would it cause if France granted diplomatic immunity, and then the US carried out a special drone delivery operation?

          why using a drone? Take him to the Eifel tower, I mean it does not have windows but it gets the job done.

          • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            It’s kinda like swatting a mosquito off your friend. Might startle them a bit at first, but once they see the intentions were good, they’ll understand.

        • maynarkh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          It would most likely mean the end of NATO, and potentially a lot of other US alliances. It would also make no sense, since the US could kill Putin in Russia if they really wanted to. They don’t want to because MAD.

        • Enoril@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Well US bases and operations (fligths etc) are not welcome here since general DeGaulle so they would be intercepted when entering our countrie borders.

        • Miaou@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          “[WR - any%] Make France ally with Russia and invade Germany”

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      He most probably would now. During the first stage of the invasion, Macron was amenable to Putin and agreed to meet in person. He’s totally flipped 180 now though, knowing he got played like a damn fool for trusting him.

      • Enoril@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        When the first stage of the invasion started, Macron was the president of Europe. So he had to play his role and present the view of the european leaders, even if it was not aligned with our internal views.

        I don’t like him, didn’t vote for him the first time (2nd time i did vote for him to avoid marine le pen election, founded by russian banks btw…) but you can’t use his behavior (amenable), trying to avoid escalation, as “yeah i’m your buddy putin, go ahead” or "i totally trust you’.

        Our head of intelligence was fired because HE didn’t present the invasion as realistic (based on normal logic it really silly)… but the whole intel community was fully aware of putin desires. President included. He knew Putin was playing with him. Everybody knew.

        But he had to play his role, as EU leader at this time.

        • rayyy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Unfortunately the average person struggles to understand a Tic-Tac-Toe aspect of politics let alone the two-dimensional chess of politics.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          If you look up “amoral opportunist” in the dictionary, there’s a picture of Macron smiling as smugly as is humanly possible.

    • Klear@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      A more salient point is that Russia was one of the fucking instigators of WW2 and only ended on the winning side through political expedience.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        It was Britain and France who enabled Hitler and who ignored Polish warnings.

        • UlfKirsten@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yes, but they didn’t invade Poland together with hitler. Slight difference there.

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Technically, there were a lot of Russian and Mongolian conscripts volunteers serving in the Osttruppen on the German side.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        I feel sorry for them if they had no choice, but I would suggest that the German side is not what is being memorialized in the ceremony.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Ehhhh…

      So, Stalin had been pushing for it, in that a second front would reduce pressure on the Soviet Union. It’d also create more difficulties for the Axis; they’d have to have some of their forces a fair distance away, hard to reinforce a spot that runs into trouble. So he politically supported it.

      The fighting on the Eastern Front wasn’t part of the D-Day landings as such, but in turn, it pulled Axis forces away from an area. The really risky part of an amphibious operation is before there’s an established beachhead – then the forces are very vulnerable. Limited retreat isn’t possible. An overall retreat is very difficult, rapid reinforcement isn’t easy. All of the supply line may be under fire. Much of the supply is on ships, which are vulnerable. A big part of making D-Day work was keeping major Axis counterattacks away until the beachhead had been enlarged enough that the landing areas weren’t at direct risk, and things like the paratrooper drops, subterfuge aimed at creating confusion, severing communications, and all that are all aimed at buying enough of a window to do that. Pressure elsewhere will help with that.

      By the time that D-Day occurred, a lot of fighting had occurred on the Eastern Front. Had that not occurred, there would have been much larger Axis forces available to counterattack in Normandy.

      D-Day wasn’t a Soviet operation, no. But Soviet actions did make it much more viable than would have otherwise been the case.

      EDIT: Also, while the great bulk of Lend-Lease was towards the Soviet Union, there was also some amount of limited “reverse Lend-Lease”, where certain materials that were in short supply with the western Allies but readily-available in the Soviet Union were shipped back. That wasn’t specific to the D-Day landings, but they’ll have generally aided operations in the west.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lend-Lease#Reverse_Lend-lease

      Reverse Lend-Lease

      Reverse Lend-Lease was the supply of equipment and services to the United States. Nearly $8 billion (equivalent to $124 billion today) worth of war material was provided to U.S. forces by its allies, 90% of this sum coming from the British Empire. Reciprocal contributions included the Austin K2/Y military ambulance, British aviation spark plugs used in B-17 Flying Fortresses, Canadian-made Fairmile launches used in anti-submarine warfare, Mosquito photo-reconnaissance aircraft, and Indian petroleum products. Australia and New Zealand supplied the bulk of foodstuffs to United States forces in the South Pacific.

      Though diminutive in comparison, the Soviet Union supplied the United States with chrome and manganese ore, platinum, gold and wood.[citation needed]

      • Gork@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It was a missed opportunity for it to be called Esael-dneL.

  • plz1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yeah, LOLing at this. He wouldn’t set foot in any country that participates in the ICC with an open international warrant out for his arrest. I think that whole thing is symbolic, though, since no host country is likely to risk open warfare with Russia by detaining their president, criminal charges notwithstanding.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Or would it go like Stalin when those who were present when he collapsed could have saved him but decided instead to do nothing?

      I’d think that those who have enough power in Russia to launch a rescue war might decide instead they are better off without him. But it does depend on what kind of dead man switches he has set.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Russia will be invited to send representatives to an international ceremony commemorating the 80th anniversary of D-day – but not Vladimir Putin, the French organisers have announced.

    “In view of the circumstances, President Putin will not be invited to take part in the commemorations of the Normandy landings,” the Liberation Mission organising committee said.

    “Russia will, however, be invited to be represented so that the importance of the commitment and sacrifices of the Soviet peoples, as well as its contribution to the victory of 1945, can be honoured.”

    Putin was invited to and attended the ceremony to mark 70th anniversary of the D-day landings despite Russia’s annexation of Crimea a few months earlier.

    At the time, the then French president, François Hollande, said: “You can have differences of opinion with Vladimir Putin but I have never forgotten and never will forget that the Russian people gave millions of lives.”

    After the June 2014 commemorations, Putin and the then Ukrainian president, Petro Poroshenko, met at the Élysée for talks after Moscow backed a pro-Russian insurgency in eastern Ukraine.


    The original article contains 298 words, the summary contains 177 words. Saved 41%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!