• Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ll just link this reply. They lost me when they said “The lock-in effect with Steam is so great that [Epic] giving games away for free is not putting a sizable dent in Valve’s dominance.”

    • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It doesn’t matter that Epic is giving away games that only run on a platform I don’t use. They won’t get my money until they get their heads out of their asses about Linux.

    • RandomException@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      EDIT: Yeah the link says pretty much the same things (and more) than I did below.

      I think it says more about Epic’s launcher and sales tactics than about Valve’s dominance. I mean, up to a certain point you can compensate your inferior product with a lower price point but if the trade-off is too high, then even giving something out for free doesn’t help. Epic’s launcher has been quite bad without any clear development in my eyes for a long time, and I can as well relate to the other commenter about not being able to use it natively on Linux. It’s just not something worth a few saved euros to put up with.

      I do wonder what’s the Steam users’ demography nowadays. Are there so many adults who earn a decent salary that they can afford actually paying for their games and enjoy a working platform (Steam) instead of saving a buck and losing their hair on the rare occasion they have the time to play something? That can be a tough crowd to lure in with some occasional free games.