• jopepa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      The best part of this former art is how it makes me smile without even seeing it. I wonder how the value would’ve adjusted if they hadn’t lost or museum hadn’t sued to begin with. Not surprised the court ruled for the museum, though. The art world’s weird; a Banksy gets shredding and becomes more valuable because of it.

        • jopepa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I mean it captures the antiestablishment spirit that’s in a lot of it, but this artist essentially commited fraud, so not the fairest light to shine on the rest of them.

              • Herbal Gamer@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I find all these kinds of modern art things incredibly pretentious and see absolutely no value in them so him being cheeky and taking the piss is exactly what they deserve.

                • jopepa@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Yeeees, quite truly sooo. Tis valueless, unsophisticated, drivel. Feigning airs of such pretension. Huhuhuhaaaa. Much like that hippy hop and the rock N roll bally hoo.

                  • Herbal Gamer@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I’m not sure what you’re trying to do but in case you’re curious, I also don’t see the immense monetary value in “traditional” art.