Over 2 percent of the US’s electricity generation now goes to bitcoin::US government tracking the energy implications of booming bitcoin mining in US.

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      I can’t believe its that high, what a fucking big, stupid, dumbdumb thing. So wasteful and for what benefit?

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        The argument on the other side of the coin is that renewable electricity is often produced in excess, and when it cannot be stored, mining bitcoin is an effective way to convert that excess electricity into money. Normally, that energy would just be wasted, reducing the efficiency and economic viability of renewable electricity sources.

        This argument is sound, but the problem is that it doesn’t describe reality. The reality is that Bitcoin miners set up shop wherever electricity is the cheapest and consume inordinate amounts of electricity whether that electricity is in excess or not, and whether that electricity was generated renewably or not.

        • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          First of all I doubt the profits generated from this go towards anything or anyone worthwhile, second, doesn’t bitcoin mining cause diminishing returns individually and across the network? Like aren’t the problems getting harder and more expensive computationally?

          • deafboy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            The mining difficulty adjusts automatically so that 1 block is produced every 10 minutes on average.

            More miners join, more difficult and expensive it gets, to the point it forces the least efficient miners to be turned off, or seek cheaper electricity. If too many leave or the price of BTC raises, more people are incentivized to join.

            • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              More miners join, more difficult and expensive it gets, to the point it forces the least efficient miners to be turned off, or seek cheaper electricity.

              So wealth continues to be concentrated by the wealthy while polluting a bunch.

              • deafboy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                So wealth continues to be concentrated by the wealthy

                You know the business is legit, when the only complaint is “BuT ThE RiCh!!”

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The cops used to find people growing marijuana in winter by the snow thawed on the roofs. Now there would be a mining rig under such a roof (also, most of the time there will be no snow, and then too much snow on occasion)

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Maybe the larger American owned projects are located in places where energy is cheaper / cooling is easier