• Kalkaline @leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    The JWST is still functioning at a very high level. It’s a poor comparison if you’re trying to argue against putting expensive stuff in space.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      The point was that it got hit, despite being smaller than this would need to be. That’s where the analogy ends, because its purpose is very different from a giant umbrella.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        The idea is less umbrella and more parasol. Tiny holes would be just fine.

        • Sonori@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          To add on to that, in more serious proposals, the idea is to mass manufacture a lot of small satellites you could hold in your hand, attached to about a km or so of hyper thin foil. At obital velocity, any micrometeorites or other object will flash vaporize an equal sized hole on contact, and indeed this is how we do modern micrometeorite shielding for spacecraft today.

          We just care about blocking a tiny fraction of relevant sunlight, holes don’t really effect the outcome compared to the negative space around the satellite.