• YMS@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          If you’re talking about specific models, sure. But if you ask a group of people “Who’s here by bicycle today?” the ones that came with an e-bike would raise their hands, too.

          • lo puto zirak@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            sure because bicycle is the generic for e-bikes too but this is not the discussion

            the discussion is about changing the name for the bikes that doesn’t have a motor just because now the e-bikes are popular in some countries despite the fact that bicycles historically don’t have a motor and the number of bikes without motor is largely superior than the ones with

            even the term e-bikes is incorrect! an e-bike should be a bicycle with a dynamo that produces electricity again a bicycle with a dynamo was invented earlier and I suppose there are more bikes with a dynamo than bikes with motor

        • YMS@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Bicycle means two wheels, so a motorbike technically is a bicycle, too.
          But e-bikes are closer to non-e-bikes than to motorcycles in terms of components, looks and propulsion.

          • lo puto zirak@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            as you said: a motor bike is technically a bicycle. ok. then the feature that makes a different name is the motor, isn’t it? then a bicycle with a motor is a motorbike.