• Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s unlikely in a closed heat exchange system. Maybe some additional evaporation because the water is slightly warmer. But unless I’m missing something, it seems very misleading to suggest that a Bitcoin transaction uses 16 kilolitres because of evaporation. Napkin math, it would require about 10 megawatt/hours of energy to evaporate that much water (please correct me if I’m wrong). I’m not a Bitcoin fanboy, I just don’t like BS.

      • lechatron@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Some water is used in humidifiers, there are also systems that use direct evaporative cooling where the water is eveporated to cool the hot air. There are probably other ways the water is lost.

        AWS’ preferred cooling strategy for its data centers is known as direct evaporative cooling. In this system, hot air is pulled from outside and pushed through water-soaked cooling pads. The water evaporates, reducing the air’s temperature, and the cool air is then sent into the server rooms.

        https://dgtlinfra.com/data-center-water-usage/

          • lechatron@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            These cooling systems remove and release all of the heat produced inside a data center – from servers, IT equipment, and mechanical infrastructure – into the outside environment, through a cooling tower that uses a water evaporation process.

            It goes outside and eventually becomes rain.

      • PenguinTD@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        someone from a totally different thread mentioned that the water can’t stay in the system because of whatever mineral stuff from the cooling pipe/anti-algae/anti-corrosive has to leave the system after certain cycles. So unless you have a treatment plant down stream it’s not exactly “drinkable” freshwater. (and I doubt water regulation would allow that to happen.)

        The consume here means that water is not usable for other application. How? I don’t know, maybe it can be used for power wash?

        • Zworf@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It probably is still a lot easier to make potable than sewer water or even river water though. At lease you know exactly what contamination is in it.

          • lechatron@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Water used to cool data centers is either consumed, meaning it evaporates into the atmosphere via the data center’s cooling towers or discharged, as industrial wastewater, usually to a local wastewater treatment plant.

            It can’t just be dumped into a river, has to go to a sewer treatment plant.

            edit: They do recirculate it, but it eventually needs to be replaced. And some facilities have treatment plants on site, so doesn’t necessarily needed to go to a sewer treatment plant.

          • PenguinTD@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I agree, it would eventually have it’s own ecosystem around that water usage if “fresh” water or not really drinking water related use is required. At this point I think it’s just cost related, cheaper just to dump into ocean.