• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sorry, are you talking about a different article? Or different people?

      Maybe you could quote something from the article which supports your point… you know, like I did.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          “completely” is a quantifier.

          You still haven’t supported your point from the original source. I have. I am not the one struggling with reading comprehension.

            • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              What is your point? Do you think this page contains an exhaustive list of quantifiers? “Completely” is a quantifier.

              And… you still haven’t supported your point from the original source.

              • yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 months ago

                “Completely” is a quantifier.

                A quantifier of intensity not a quantifier of quantity. This is really not that hard.

                you still haven’t supported your point from the original source

                See, this is not how these things work. You’re the one who made a claim about the content of this article. I showed you you’re wrong. That is my point. End of story.

                • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  You’re the one who made a claim about the content of this article.

                  I didn’t ‘make a claim about the content of this article’ … I quoted content directly from this article.

                  I showed you you’re wrong.

                  No, you haven’t. You’ve given your opinion, which is different from what is proposed in the article. Which is fine, the proposal in the article is poorly thought out and anyone reasonable should have a different opinion… which is my point.