• d3Xt3r
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s strange seeing “kills” and “Android” in the same sentence without any mention of “Google”.

  • pelya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Android makers apparently have expressed an preference to use “standards-based solutions” rather than Qualcomm’s proprietary solution.

    So Verizon got burned by Qualcomm’s CDMA patents once too many.

  • PeachMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Huh, that was quick. Seems like manufacturers weren’t cooperating, and then T-Mobile announced the Starlink partnership. Maybe they realized they just couldn’t compete with that, so they pulled the plug.

    Oh well, I for one was nervous about another Qualcomm proprietary thing becoming the standard; we’ve had quite enough of their anti-competitive bullshit recently. As evidenced by Apple absolutely spanking Qualcomm with their A-series chips’ power efficiency for several years now. Embarassing time to be an Android fanboy.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Qualcomm makes chips and Android is an operating system, dude. I don’t know any Qualcomm fanboys

      • PeachMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Right, and they’ve had a near monopoly on US Android phones for like two decades now. In processors and modems. They’ve gotten fucking lazy, and they’re holding Android back.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          I still don’t get your comment about it being embarrassing to be an android fanboy

          • PeachMan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            10 months ago

            Cuz iPhone processors are objectively better? That wasn’t the case a decade ago.

            • glimse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              10 months ago

              Why would that be an embarrassing thing though? Android users like the OS, not the chips they run on lol

              • PeachMan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Yes, and my argument is that the lack of chipset diversity is holding the platform back. More recently, Google’s doing interesting stuff with Tensor and Mediatek apparently made some decent SoC’s. But Qualcomm still has way too much of the (US) market.

                • evo@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  MediaTek, Samsung, Nvidia and now Google make ARM chips. Android has tried x86. And has recently added support for RISC-V.

                  Diversity is not the problem. Honestly there is no problem. Apple just makes damn good chips. 🤷

            • n2burns@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              That’s patently false. Ever since Apple introduced their own silicon (A4 released in 2010), they’ve generally had the best performance of any ARM chip. It’s not that the competition is bad, it’s just Apple has historically been excellent at recruiting top engineers and executing their products. For example, in the Intel-era, there were multiple years publications said the best Windows laptop was a Mac.

              • PeachMan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Patiently false? LMAO. I said a decade offhand but to be more exact it’s thirteen years. Thank you, Captain Pedant. 🙄

                • n2burns@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  No, to be more exact, it’s 14 years (you have to go back one more year).