• k_rol@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Then the YouTube comment section saying how it’s our fault since we are close to China. I don’t know why I still read them.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why do you still read them? (Edit: I’m not being snarky, I’m curious why)

      Every few months I forget why I stopped reading comment sections and dip back into unmoderated comments on news sites. It’s awful.

      • joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think I often hope occasionally reporting comments helps slowly make the platforms better. But it really doesn’t seem to 😞

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        A long time ago, every comment on YouTube was vitriol. It didn’t matter what the video was, every single comment was pure poison. Today you can safely read the comments on videos that don’t have political context. Of course anything political is going to be completely overrun with state level astroturfing, extremists, and mouth breathers. Occasionally I’ll accidentally read the comments on something political, forgetting that comments should be off-limits for that video.

        • brax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You should see the shit Microsoft pulls with MSNBC. Editorialized headlines, and direct comments sections. It’s pure toxic garbage, and they jam it down boomer throats by making it the default landing page in Edge (and IE) and that stupid “news and interests” spot on the taskbar that you have to disable.

          This being the same company that got themselves into an antitrust lawsuit for bundling IE with Windows 20 years ago. Fucking bonkers how horribly times have changed.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not a bot … at least I don’t think I am

      But I still want to ask … why are Canadian military aircraft flying in international waters off the coast of China.

      How would we feel if Chinese military aircraft were flying off the coast of Canada?

      And there is military tension on Chinese borders, why would we want to further antagonize them?

      • Recant@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Well it’s international airspace and nations can fly whatever they want inside international airspace regardless of the proximity to a nation.

        Russians do it to Canada and the United States often but it doesn’t make much fanfare because the parties involved handle it professionally

        https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/russian-bombers-buzz-canadian-airspace-1.5447833

        https://www.stripes.com/branches/air_force/2022-10-18/russian-bombers-alaska-american-jets-7735230.html

      • HollandJim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        why are Canadian military aircraft flying in international waters off the coast of China?

        You mean, why are planes flying in international airspace?

        Maybe grow up a bit, China. You’re behaving like a toddler.

      • ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        why are Canadian military aircraft flying in international waters off the coast of China

        From the description of the video, should you care to read it:

        Global News was on board the Canadian military aircraft reporting on the mission, which is part of Operation NEON, Canada’s contribution to helping enforce sanctions against North Korea, when the aggressive intercepts took place.

      • phx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Uh, they already do that. We generally don’t buzz the planes and antagonize them

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s part of our role in ensuring international sanctions are followed

        It’s about shipping lanes to North Korea, nothing to do with China

      • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The story takes on a whole new meaning if the roles are reversed … How would we feel if a Chinese military aircraft was flying in international waters off the coast of Canada?

        You know they already do it all the time off the coast of the US and Canada, right? So whatever you were already feeling, keep feeling that.

        In case you didn’t get that from your comment in the other community.