Bosses and workers still can't agree on whether the commute is part of the work day
fortune.com
It's creating a $578 billion productivity problem
  • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
    905·
    1 year ago

    Commutes are part of the work day if the employer does not allow WFH. How else is the employee supposed to show up for work?

    There is no reason to debate, it’s clear as day. But the greedy, rich assholes on the reins think everyone should be honored to waste their lives working under them.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      223·
      1 year ago

      Commutes are part of the work day if the employer does not allow WFH. How else is the employee supposed to show up for work?

      This.

      Our country went mostly work-from-home for over a year, and people were more productive, not less. If you’re going to inconvenience your work force unnecessarily then you should pay for it, absolutely.

      • nxdefiant@startrek.website
        112·
        1 year ago

        Sounds like commuting is an incredibly stupid and inefficient waste of time. Maybe this hypothetical company would get better performance from their employees if they didn’t have a commute. Maybe letting them work from home?

      • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
        2·
        1 year ago

        That means we’ll just stop hiring people who live far away, even in the person is willing to make the commute.

        No change from the status quo. As it stands, employees move next to their workplace because nobody is ok with a 4-hour commute. It’s impossible even if you give up on social life.