Nyme (@Uwu)
calckey.social
@[email protected] how do I report a Magazin on kbin.social ? There is a usere called "ps" who is posting to his own "antiwoke" Magazin on kbin.social. Please remove this and dont give them a chance to etablish them self on kbin.social. When I report his stuff it will go to him because he is the moderator of the magazin? Seems like a problem. Screenshot of the "antiwoke" Magazin /sub on kbin.social. 4 Headlines are visible, 2 exampels: "Time to reject the extrem trans lobby harming our society" "How to end wokeness" #Moderation #kbin #kbin.social 📎

@ernest how do I report a Magazin on kbin.social ? There is a usere called “ps” who is posting to his own “antiwoke” Magazin on kbin.social. Please remove this and dont give them a chance to etablish them self on kbin.social. When I report his stuff it will go to him because he is the moderator of the magazin? Seems like a problem. Screenshot of the “antiwoke” Magazin /sub on kbin.social. 4 Headlines are visible, 2 exampels: “Time to reject the extrem trans lobby harming our society” “How to end wokeness” #Moderation #kbin #kbin.social 📎

edit: dont feed the troll, im shure ernest will delet them all when he sees this. report and move on.

Edit 2 : Ernest responded:
“I just need a little more time. There will likely be a technical break announced tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. Along with the migration to new servers, we will be introducing new moderation tools that I am currently working on and testing (I had it planned for a bit later in my roadmap). Then, I will address your reports and handle them very seriously. I try my best to delete sensitive content, but with the current workload and ongoing relocation, it takes a lot of time. I am being extra cautious now. The regulations are quite general, and I would like to refine them together with you and do everything properly. For now, please make use of the option to block the magazine/author.”

❤

  • webghost0101@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    0·
    1 year ago

    My point is not about censoring speech neither is it about disallowing usa republicans from having a public community. I am not from the us and my public intolerance is towards the active displays of hate and discrimination often associated with fascist ideology.

    Il provide some examples of what I personally would say is ok/not ok in real life public spaces (in general not just politics) But the real challenge we need to solve on lemmy is how to translats it to a digital space.

    Ok:

    • civil disagreement
    • having a heated argument
    • stating you are personally pro-x, anti-y
    • having a body tattoo of any strong ideological symbol

    Questionable:

    • using a slur in a heated argument.
    • wearing clothes with strong ideological symbols to an everyday outing.

    Not ok:

    • marching around the streets with a nazi flag
    • stalking
    • reading detailed pornographic literature aloud towards a group of children.
    • seeking out public events with the goal to intimidate non political organizers and event visitors.
    • any kind of instigating of violence towards people or their personal property.
    • 10A@kbin.social
      1·
      1 year ago

      I appreciate that you point out you’re not in the US, because our various cultural perspectives and expectations certainly do inform our opinions. (Although there’s quite a range of variance within the US too.)

      While I believe my self-designation as “conservative” is quite accurate, at least in an American context, my personal rearrangement of your lists would be far more liberal. The only items I’d put under “not okay” are porn for kids and instigating violence. (Thankfully we don’t need to deal with literal violence on an online platform.) It’s interesting how ideas can get categorized as left or right depending on the context and viewpoint.

      If we were to survey the greater federated community here, I’m sure we’d get a variety of answers as to what’s okay, questionable, and not okay. My position is that’s a good thing, as our diversity of ideas enriches the community, and we can all learn from each other.

      • webghost0101@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        1·
        1 year ago

        This was a reasonably insightful discussion that i am not sure we can tame much further. We align on the core value of freedom of speech but are opposites on the semantics of where to draw a line.

        I have to ask though.

        Stalking is not, “not ok”? I’ve understood stalking as a serious crime all my life. I am very curious to hear of any possible justification to allow it.

        For contexts when i say stalking i mean groups/someone following you every where you go in public for a reasonable time. Or continued and constant breaching of personal space after trying to get away.

        • 10A@kbin.social
          1·
          1 year ago

          Yep. Personally I’d put stalking under questionable.

          It’s usually a creepy thing to do, but there might be cases where you just want to look out for someone’s safety, so you follow them. Usually that’s not a stalker’s goal, but it varies. If the stalking results in an assault, robbery, or any other crime, that’s certainly not okay! But the stalking itself was just questionable until that happened.

          Note that if you follow someone online, which is a feature built into kbin, that’s stalking. And there’s really nothing wrong with it, unless you follow someone just to downvote all of their contributions.