• transigence@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s literally gender ideology politics. Outside of that, there is zero reason to take down the mod. It harms nobody. It doesn’t even violate their own TOS.

    • CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Gender ideology isn’t a political stance, wtf are you talking about?

      This is the equivalent of me making a mod that removes all black people and calling it a political statement.

      • transigence@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        33
        ·
        10 months ago

        Gender ideology is literally sexual politics. The inclusion of the ability to select your pronouns (as opposed to what, I don’t know, them being fixed according to the sex of the generated character?) is sexual politics. Modding that choice out is sexual politics. Removing the mod is sexual politics. Every action taken by all parties in this story is sexual politics.

        • CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Sexual Politics - the principles determining the relationship of the sexes; relations between the sexes regarded in terms of power.

          Now, tell me where removing the options for pronouns in a video game fits within that definition.

          Apparently you can just add “politics” to the end of anything to try and justify discrimination. My mod that removes all black people from the game is just “race politics”, so it’s okay!

          • transigence@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            24
            ·
            10 months ago

            All of gender ideology is sexual politics. It’s an attack on the conceptual model of the sexes as they are intuitively understood — an attempt to hijack the language that is used to describe the sexes in an attempt to push gender ideology into the mainstream.

            • CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              26
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’m sorry man, I wish I could help you. But this… I think you’re in a bit too deep.

              Nobody is “hijacking” anything, and nobody is forcefully pushing ideologies on anyone. It’s as simple as groups of people wanting to be treated just as well as anyone else - it’s not any more complicated than that.

              I hope eventually you find your way out of this.

    • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      It does:

      Content that may be generally construed as provocative, divisive, objectionable, discriminatory, or abusive toward any real-world individual or group, may be subject to moderation. This includes but is not limited to content involving politics, race, religion, gender identity, sexuality, or social class. We tolerate content related to real world issues and events as long as the appropriate tag (“Real World Issues”) is used and the content is handled in a tasteful, respectful, and non-inflammatory manner. Users who do not wish to see such content should make use of our content blocking feature.

      And it is their platform, that’s why they care. They can dictate what is and isn’t allowed there.