Prince of Persia: The Lost Throne was a critical hit but didn't sell very well, and Michael Douse thinks that's entirely Ubisoft's fault.

Larian director of publishing Michael Douse, never one to be shy about speaking his mind, has spoken his mind about Ubisoft’s decision to disband the Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown development team, saying it’s the result of a “broken strategy” that prioritizes subscriptions over sales.

Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown is quite good. PC Gamer’s Mollie Taylor felt it was dragged down by a very slow start, calling it “a slow burn to a fault” in an overall positive review, and it holds an enviable 86 aggregate score on Metacritic. Despite that, Ubisoft recently confirmed that the development team has been scattered to the four winds to work on “other projects that will benefit from their expertise.”

This, Douse feels, is at least partially the outcome of Ubisoft’s focus on subscriptions over conventional game sales—the whole “feeling comfortable with not owning your game” thing espoused by Ubisoft director of subscriptions Philippe Tremblay earlier this year—and the decision to stop releasing games on Steam, which is far and away the biggest digital storefront for PC gaming.

  • kautau@lemmy.worldEnglish
    411·
    7 days ago

    Agreed, I’m always saddened by quotes like “well the devs should have” when it’s almost certainly “the execs should have.” Unless a studio is owned by its devs, or they make up some of its leadership, which are few and far between, the devs don’t have the say on the shitty things that happen to the product they’re working on, and often when the devs have more say you end up with like Kingdom Come Deliverance from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warhorse_Studios. One of my favorite games, was supported by the studio for long after it came out, and now they’re working on a promising sequel

    • Zagorath@aussie.zoneEnglish
      12·
      7 days ago

      Fwiw the sequel is supposedly going to have Denuvo in it, which is pretty blatantly an executive meddling decision.

      But personally, the phrase “the devs should” never bothers me. It’s pretty transparently referring not to individual developers but to the priorities and decisions of the “developer”: the company in charge of development, as distinct from, say, the publisher or the platform.

    • AhismaMiasma@lemm.eeEnglish
      7·
      7 days ago

      As a huge KCD fan (donated to the Kickstarter!) I have very, very low hopes for KCD2.

      It will have Denuvo. Warhorse is awesome, but they are already not great at optimization. KCD on launch was rough. Amazing, fun, but rough.

      Adding Denuvo is just asking for exceptionally poor performance.

      • kautau@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        6 days ago

        Ah that’s disappointing to hear. And also probably extends my point that now warhorse has grown, and their execs are making bad calls that I’m sure the devs would choose not to make

    • boonhet@lemm.eeEnglish
      4·
      7 days ago

      Worst part is, they got acquired the year after release, so even if KC:D 2 is good, their games in the more distant future are bound to be enshittified.

      • sylver_dragon@lemmy.worldEnglish
        6·
        7 days ago

        Even worse that acquisition links back to the Embracer Group. Hopefully KC:D 2 makes it out the door before Embracer full fucks up Warhorse.

        • AhismaMiasma@lemm.eeEnglish
          4·
          7 days ago

          Seems they already did. KCD2 will have Denuvo.

          Let’s put CPU heavy malware on an already CPU taxing game from a dev team known for not having the best optimization. Wcgw?

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      7 days ago

      The studios owned by the devs almost uniformly don’t put out complete gacha cash grab bullshit